摘要
本文通过对2008年6月至2013年6月在吉林省吉林市妇产医院进行腹膜内剖宫产术的572例患者与腹膜外剖宫产术的428例患者的临床资料进行随机选择、归纳、比较两组患者的术后恢复情况。结果显示两种剖宫产术式在胎儿娩出时间、手术总时间、术中副损伤、术中失血量、新生儿评分等方面无显著性差异,腹膜外剖宫产对比腹膜内剖宫产有术后腹胀轻微、排气时间早、住院时间短,有显著性差异。结论是腹膜外剖宫产术对比腹膜内剖宫产术操作者能熟练掌握技术对设备无特殊要求,术后排气时间较早,切口愈合时间较短,术后发生肠粘连、肠梗阻概率低,疼痛小,有利于乳汁分泌。
In this paper, 428 cases of extraperitioneal cesarean and 572 cases of intraperitioneal cesarean were compared by baby deliver time, total operation time, blood loss, as well as neonatal Apgar score, with no significant difference observed between the two groups. However, the extraperitioneal cesarean has its advantages, such as earlier exhaust and fewer hospital days. It can be concluded that the extraperitioneal cesarean method is prior to the intraperitioneal cesarean.
出处
《中国西部科技》
2014年第12期83-84,共2页
Science and Technology of West China
