期刊文献+

三阴性乳腺癌与非三阴性乳腺癌的钼靶与超声比较 被引量:20

Triple-negative and Non-triple-negative Breast Cancer:A Comparison of Mammography and Ultrasonography
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)与非三阴性乳腺癌(NTNBC)的钼靶X线及超声特征,提高TNBC的影像诊断水平。资料与方法根据免疫组化检测结果,将387例乳腺癌患者分成TNBC组54例和NTNBC组333例,回顾性分析两组患者的钼靶X线图像、超声声像图及临床病理资料。结果 TNBC组肿瘤组织学分级高,浸润性导管癌Ⅲ级明显多于NTNBC组(χ2=47.009,P<0.001);腋窝淋巴结转移率高于NTNBC组(χ2=4.658,P<0.05)。乳腺钼靶X线显示,TNBC组主要表现为肿块(37例,69.8%),钙化少见(10例,18.9%),肿块多呈圆形或椭圆形(28例,62.2%),边缘清晰(16例,35.6%),毛刺征少见(5例,11.1%);NTNBC组多表现为肿块伴钙化(138例,42.1%),形态多不规则(119例,46.5%),毛刺征多见(77例,30.1%),两组在肿块、钙化、形态及边缘方面差异有统计学意义(χ2=24.618、19.889、32.605、21.102,P<0.001)。超声显示,TNBC组主要表现为肿块(52例,96.3%),钙化少见(5例,9.3%),肿块多呈圆形或椭圆形(27例,51.9%),边缘清晰(25例,48.1%),毛刺征少见(3例,5.8%),肿块后方回声衰减少见(5例,9.6%);NTNBC组多表现为肿块(318例,96.1%),钙化多见(135例,40.8%),形态多不规则(243例,76.4%),毛刺征多见(76例,23.9%),肿块后方回声衰减者多见(78例,24.5%),两组在肿块钙化、形态、边缘、肿块后方回声方面差异有统计学意义(χ2=19.006、18.339,P<0.001;χ2=16.170、8.429,P<0.05)。结论在钼靶X线和超声中,TNBC主要表现为边缘清晰的圆形或椭圆形肿块,肿块后方回声衰减少见,更倾向于良性肿瘤的影像学特点;NTNBC主要表现为形态不规则的毛刺边缘肿块,钙化多见,上述影像学特征有助于TNBC的早期诊断。 Purpose To compare the mammography and ultrasound imaging features of triplenegative breast cancer(TNBC) and non-triple-negative breast cancer(NTNBC), and to improve TNBC diagnosis. Materials and Methods Using immunohistochemical staining technique, 387 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer were divided into TNBC group(n=54) and NTNBC group(n=333). Mammography and ultrasound findings as well as pathological data were retrospectively reviewed. Results TNBC was associated with higher tumor grades. There were significantly more grade III infiltrating ductal carcinomas and axillary lymph node involvement in TNBC group than in NTNBC group(χ2=47.009, P0.001; χ2=4.658, P0.05). On mammography, TNBC most frequently presented with a mass(n=37, 69.8%) and was less associated with microcalcifications(n=10, 18.9%). TNBC masses were mostly round or oval(n=28, 62.2%) with circumscribed margin(n=16, 35.6%). Spiculated margins were rare(n=5, 11.1%). NTNBC most frequently presented as a mass with calcifications(n=138, 42.1%), and was more irregular in shape(n=119, 46.5%). Spiculated margins were common(n=77, 30.1%). There was statistically significant difference between these two groups in mass, microcalcification, shape and margin(χ2=24.618, 19.889, 32.605 and 21.102, P0.001). On ultrasonograhy, TNBC most frequently presented as a mass(n=52, 96.3%) with less microcalcifications(n=5, 9.3%). TNBC masses were more frequently round or oval(n=27, 51.9%) with circumscribed margins(n=25, 48.1%). Spiculated margins were rare(n=3, 5.8%). TNBC was less likely to show attenuating posterior echoes(n=5, 9.6%); NTNBC most frequently presented as a mass(n=318, 96.1%) with microcalcifications(n=135, 40.8%). NTNBC masses were more frequently irregular in shape(n=243, 76.4%) with spiculated margins(n=76, 23.9%). NTNBC was more likely to show attenuating posterior echoes(n=78, 24.5%). There was statistically significant difference between these two groups in microcalcification, shape, margin and posterior echo(χ2=19.006 and 18.339, P0.001; χ2=16.170 and 8.429, P0.05). Conclusion TNBC demonstrates round or oval mass with circumscribed margin and is less likely to show attenuating posterior echoes on mammography and ultrasound with benign imaging features. NTNBC frequently presents as irregular mass with spiculated margin, and is more associated with microcalcifications. These imaging findings are useful in early diagnosis of TNBC.
出处 《中国医学影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期725-729,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81271647)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 乳房X线摄影术 超声检查 乳房 病理学 外科 女(雌)性 Breast neoplasms Mammography Ultrasonography mammary Pathology surgical Female
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Dawson SJ, Provenzano E, Caldas C. Triple negative breast cancers: clinical and prognostic implications. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(Suppl 1): 27-40.
  • 2CaldareUa A, Crocetti E, Bianchi S, et al. Female breast cancer status according to ER, PR and HER2 expression: a population based analysis. Pathol Oncol Res, 2011, 17(3): 753-758.
  • 3Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(15): 2568-2581.
  • 4American College of Radiology. Breast imaging repotting and data system. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  • 5American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  • 6须捷平,徐曙光,张云,俞羚,吴连明,殷志强,曹晖.三阴性乳腺癌的临床病理特征和预后影响因素分析[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(5):637-641. 被引量:18
  • 7Kim MJ, Ro JY, Ahn SH, et al. Clinicopathologic significance of the basal-like subtype of breast cancer: A comparison with hormone receptor and Her2/neu-overexpressing phenotypes. Hum Pathol, 2006, 37(9): 1217-1226.
  • 8Dent R, Trudeau M, Pfitchard KI, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13(15 Pt 1): 4429-4434.
  • 9Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology, 2009, 250(3): 638-647.
  • 10Wojcinski S, Soliman AA, Schmidt J, et al. Sonographic features of triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med, 2012, 31(10): 1531-1541.

二级参考文献50

  • 1Aider I)D, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: predliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6) :553 559.
  • 2Bryan BB, Schnitt SJ, Collins LC, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ with basal-like phenotype: a possible precursor to invasive basal like breast cancer. Mod Pathol, 2006,19(5) :617-621.
  • 3Raha EA, Elsayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer, 2007, 109(1) :25-32.
  • 4Morris GJ, Naidu S, Topham AK, et al. Differences in breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African-American and Caucasian patients: a single-institution compilation compared with the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer, 2007,110(4):876-884.
  • 5Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, et al. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER) negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2 negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple negative phenotype: a population-based study from the Cali fornia cancer Registry. Cancer, 2007,109(9) :1721-1728.
  • 6Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res, 2007,13(2) :4429-4434.
  • 7Ko ES, Lee BH, Kim HA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between imaging and pathological findings. Eur Radiol, 2010,20(5):1111-1117.
  • 8Caldarella A, Crocetti E, Bianchi S, et al. Female breast cancer status according to ER, PR and HER2 expression: a population based analysis. Pathol Oncol Res, 201 l, 17(3): 753-758.
  • 9Yao-Lung K, Dar-Ren C, Tsai-Wang C. Clinicopathological features of triple-negative breast cancer in Taiwan Residents women. lnt J Clin Oncol, 2011t 16(5): 500-505.
  • 10American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003.

共引文献78

同被引文献176

  • 1吕青青,张勇,程敬亮,朱晨迪,汪卫建,许珂.ADC直方图在鉴别胶质母细胞瘤和脑单发转移瘤的应用价值[J].中华生物医学工程杂志,2018,24(6):441-445. 被引量:2
  • 2尹益民,任晓萍,潘文倩,艾红.高频超声及钼靶X线检查在乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2012,33(5):572-575. 被引量:79
  • 3张明亮,张晓静,田怀杲,王益民,孙医学,葛侠.染料法腋窝反向淋巴作图在早期乳腺癌手术中的应用及分析[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(5):452-455. 被引量:9
  • 4罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,曾婕,杨海云.改良超声弹性成像评分标准在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2006,12(5):396-398. 被引量:382
  • 5Bargall6 X, Velasco M, Santamarfa G, et al. Role of computer- aided detection in very small screening detected invasive breast cancers [J]. J Digit Imaging, 2013, 26(3): 572-577.
  • 6Merlin JL, Harle A, Lion M, et al. Expression and activation of P38 MAP kinase in invasive ductal breast cancers: correlation with expression of the estrogen receptor, HER2 and downstream signaling phosphorylated proteins [J]. Oncol Rep, 2013, 30 (4) : 1943-1948.
  • 7Gweon HM, Son EJ, Youk JH, et al. Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions [J]. Acta Radiol, 2012, 53(3): 255-260.
  • 8Dogan B E, Dryden M J, Wei W, et al. Sonography andsonographically guided needle biopsy of internal mammary nodes in staging of patients with breast cancer [ J ]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2015,205 (4) :905-911.
  • 9Ohta T, Nishioka M, Nakata N, et al. Five cases of axillary lymph node metastatic breast cancer on contrast-enhanced sonography [J].J Ultrasound Med,2015,34 ( 6 ) : 1131-1137.
  • 10Lai H W, Chert D R, Wu Y C, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with sonography in the prediction of breast cancer tumor size: a concordance analysis with histopathologically determined tumor size[J]. Ann Surg Onco1,2015, 22(12) :3816-3823.

引证文献20

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部