摘要
美国Speaker案和Daniels案,揭示了为防治传染病而频繁使用的强制医疗控制措施,却屡次伤害和侵袭公民个体的权利和自由的现实。实体法必须对自由进行限制,但其正当性还应得到程序性规则之检视。两起事件暴露出美国传染病防治中出现的立法及法律实施问题,在强制医疗过程中完善保障患者权利的规则、明确法院审查原则和审查标准以提高审判智慧方面,为我们提供了经验和借鉴。
Case of Daniels and case of Speaker in the United States in 2007 revealed the measures of Compulsory Medical Treatment frequently used for control of communicable diseases, which always hurt and invade the rights and freedom of citizens. The conclusion that whether substance must limit freedom needs to get examined by the procedural rules. The two cases exposed the problems of legislation and law enforcement in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in the United States. It also provided experience and reference for us to perfect the rules to protect patients' rights and to improve the judgment of wisdom with the principles and standards of judicial review.
出处
《比较法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期157-169,共13页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年课题"强制医疗法律关系研究"(10YJC820054)的研究成果
广州市城乡公共卫生服务体系建设研究基地研究成果