期刊文献+

CT值对输尿管下段结石选择治疗方法的指导意义 被引量:3

Role of CT Hounsfield unit of stone in choice of treatment to lower urethral calculi
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨cT值对于输尿管下段结石选择治疗方法的价值。方法选择不同CT值的三组(A组HU〈700,B组HU700—1000,C组HU〉1000)输尿管下段结石的患者,分别行体外碎石(ESWL)+药物治疗,治疗后有变化但还有未排出的结石,间隔10~14d后再行2次或3次ESWL。治疗后3~6个月复查。结果A组(n=45)患者中43例结石排出占95.6%,B组(n=31)患者中23例结石排出,占74.2%,C组(n=36)患者中15例患者结石排出占41.7%,均未出现明显并发症。结论输尿管下段结石的CT值对指导治疗方法的选择有重要价值,HU〈700的患者应首选ESWL。 Objective To explore the role of CT Hounsfield unit (Hn) of stone in the choice of treatment methods to lower urethral calculi, for the improvement in treatment efficiency. Methods The patients with lower urethral calculi were classified into three groups according to their different CT Hu(Group A, HU 〈 700;GroupB, HU 700 - 1 000; Group C, HU 〉 1 000). Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was used in the patients 1 to 3 times and followed three to six months. Results The stone elimina- ting rate was 95.6% (43/45) in Group A, 74.2% (23/31) in Group B and 41.7% (15/36) in Group C. No serious complications were found. Conclusion CT Hu of stone is of important value for the treatment for lower urethral calculi. ESWL is the first choice for those with CT Hu less than 700.
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2014年第9期915-916,共2页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词 输尿管下段结石 CT值 体外碎石 :lower urethral calculus Hounsfield unit extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1王国民,章仁安,张元芳,张永康.尿结石理化性质检测在体外冲击波碎石中的意义[J].上海医科大学学报,1995,22(2):131-134. 被引量:7
  • 2Gonzalez Enquita C, Cabrera Perez J, Calahorra Fernandez F J, et al. Treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves[J]. Arch Esp Urol, 2001,54 (9) : 971 -982.
  • 3Murshidi M S. Simple radiological indicators for staghorn calculi response to ESWL[J]. Int Urol Nephrol,2006,38(1) :69-73.
  • 4Wang S C, Hsu Y S, Chen K K, et al. Correlation between urinary tract pure stone composition and stone morphology on plain abdominal film[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2004,67(5) :235-238.
  • 5Sheir K Z, Mansour O, Madbouly K, et al. Determination pf the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noneontrast spiral computerized tomography[J]. Urol Res, 2005,33(2) :99-104.
  • 6Maqnuson W J, Tomera K M, Lance R S. Hounsfield unit density accurately predicts ESWL success[J].Alaska Med, 2005,47 (2) : 6 - 9.
  • 7Pareek G, Armenakas N A, Fracchia J A. Hounsfield unit on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J]. J Urol,2003,169:1679-1681.
  • 8Ahn S H, Mayo-smith W W, Murphy B L, et al. Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation[J].Radiology, 2002,225 ( 1 ) : 159- 164.
  • 9Yoshida S, Hayashi T, Ikeda J, et al. Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on non contrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [J]. Urology, 2006, 68( 1 ) :33-37.
  • 10Ansari M S, Gupta N P, Seth A, et al. Stone fragility: its therapeutic implications in shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract stones [ J ]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2003,35 (3) : 387-392.

共引文献36

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部