期刊文献+

情绪领导力:概念、测量、发展与模型建构 被引量:22

Emotional Leadership: Conceptualization, Measurement, Development and Model Construction
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 情绪领导力是指领导者基于自身情绪能力,通过情绪传染和策略运用来有效管理组织成员的正性和负性情绪,充分发挥不同情绪的有利效价,营造应景的组织情绪氛围,带领组织成员为实现组织共同目标而奋斗。目前,情绪领导力的测量主要是借用情绪智力量表,缺乏标准化工具。情绪领导力的研究发展经历3个阶段:以领导情绪能力为中心、以领导情绪传染为中心和以情绪领导力为中心。基于各阶段研究梳理,建构整合模型:遗传基因、人格和情绪特质对情绪领导力起预测作用,大脑活动(右侧额叶)与情绪领导力互为因果关系。情绪领导力通过直接和间接两条路径对个体和组织层面的领导效能产生显著影响。未来研究应加强对概念、测量、调节机制、生物基础、组织层面议题和跨文化对比等方面进行探讨。 Emotional leadership refers to a leadership style that the leaders use emotional contagion and strategies to manage members’ positive and negative emotion, create a suitable organization emotional climate and lead members to strive for common goals based on their own emotional competencies. At present, most studies use emotional intelligence scale to measure emotional leadership and lack a standardized measurement tool. The development of emotional leadership research is divided into three stages: leaders’ emotional competency focused research, emotional contagion focused research, and emotional leadership focused research. Based on the research contents, we propose a multi-level integration model. Gene, personality and emotional trait can predict emotional leadership. Right frontal lobe and emotional leadership are reciprocal causation. Emotional leadership has a significant positive influence on leadership effectiveness at both organizational level and individual level through direct or indirect routes. Conceptualization, measurement, moderators, biology basis, multi-level study and cross-cultural comparison should get more attention in the future researches.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期1757-1769,共13页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(10YJAXLX015)
关键词 情绪领导力 情绪管理 情绪能力 情绪传染 emotional leadership emotion management emotional competence emotional contagion
  • 相关文献

参考文献77

二级参考文献170

  • 1凌文辁,陈龙,王登.CPM领导行为评价量表的建构[J].心理学报,1987,19(2):199-207. 被引量:117
  • 2赵延东,罗家德.如何测量社会资本:一个经验研究综述[J].国外社会科学,2005(2):18-24. 被引量:271
  • 3Ashkanasy, N. M., Ha"rtel, C. E. J., & Daus, C. S. (2002). Diversity and emotion: The new frontiers in organizational behavior research. Journal of Management, 28, 307-338.
  • 4Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E.(2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 36-59.
  • 5Basch, J., & Fisher, C. D. (2000). Affective events-emotions matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. In N. Ashkanasy, C.Hartel, & W. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace." Research, theory, and practice (pp.36-48). Westport, CT: Quorum.
  • 6Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445-464.
  • 7Cano, C. R., Sams, D., & Schwartz, J. (2009). The job stress-job performance relationship in the social service encounter. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 14, 83-93.
  • 8Choi, J. N., Sung, S. S. Y., Lee, K., & Cho, Dong-Sung. (2010). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior (Published online in Wiley Inter Science DOI: 10.1002/job.684).
  • 9Dasborough, M. T. (2006). Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1Z 163-178.
  • 10Dasborough, M. T., Ashkanasy, N. M., Tee, H. E. Y. J., & Tse H. M. (2009). What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 571-585.

共引文献205

同被引文献265

引证文献22

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部