期刊文献+

基于模糊软集合理论的Agent联盟评价 被引量:2

Evaluation of Agent coalition based on fuzzy soft set theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对多Agent系统中影响联盟功效的因素存在很强的模糊性和不确定性的问题,提出采用模糊软集合理论对Agent联盟进行综合评价。首先,待评价联盟给出自己属性,每位专家根据自己的知识和经验给出评价指标集及对应的评价矩阵;然后,利用模糊软集合理论实现评价矩阵的融合,得到最终评价结果。最后通过实例说明该方法能有效、合理地处理信息的模糊性和不确定性,评价过程符合人的思维判断。 To solve the problem that the factors, which affect the coalition efficacy in Multi-Agent Systems( MAS), have strong ambiguity and uncertainty, fuzzy soft set theory was adopted to make a comprehensive evaluation on Agent coalition.First, the coalition to be evaluated gave its own property, each expert gave evaluation set of indexes and corresponding evaluation matrix according to his knowledge and experience. Then, fuzzy soft set theory was used to fuse the evaluation matrix and obtain the results of final evaluation. Finally, a practical example was given to prove that the method can deal with ambiguity and uncertainty of information effectively and reasonably, and the process of evaluation accords with human thinking and judgment.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期3250-3253,共4页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51174257) 安徽理工大学青年教师科学研究基金资助项目(2012QNY34)
关键词 AGENT联盟 复杂控制与决策 模糊软集合 信息融合 综合评价 Agent coalition complex control and decision making fuzzy soft set information fusion comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1杜峰,施文康,邓勇.证据特征提取及其在证据理论改进中的应用[J].上海交通大学学报,2004,38(z1):164-168. 被引量:19
  • 2杨海峰,侯朝桢.证据理论组合公式的分析与改进[J].计算机工程,2005,31(7):21-23. 被引量:3
  • 3吕文红,吴祈宗,郭银景.基于D-S证据理论的群决策专家意见集结方法[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(2):10-13. 被引量:14
  • 4夏娜,蒋建国,魏星,章玲.改进型蚁群算法求解单任务Agent联盟[J].计算机研究与发展,2005,42(5):734-739. 被引量:27
  • 5Zoltkin G, Rosenschein J S. Coalition, Cryptography, and Stability: Mechanisms for Coalition Formation in Task Oriented Domains [A]. Proc of the National Conf on Artificial Intelligence [C]. Seattle: AAAI Press, 1994: 432-437.
  • 6Sandholm T W, Lesser V R. Coalition Among Computationally Bounded Agents [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1997, 94(1): 99-137.
  • 7Perez-Castrillo D, Wettstein D. Bidding for the Surplus: A Non-cooperative Approach to the Shapley Value [J]. J of Economic Theory, 2001, 100(2): 274-294.
  • 8Leen K S, Costas T. Utility-based Multiagent Coalition Formation with Incomplete Information and Time Constraints [A]. Proc of SMC-03 [C]. Washington, DC: IEEE Press, 2003:1481-1486.
  • 9Leen K S, Costas T. Real-time Satisficing Multiagent Coalition formation[A]. Working Notes of the AAAI Workshop on Coalition Formation in Dynamic Multiagent Environments[C]. Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 2002:7-15.
  • 10Maria V B, Ricardo C, Jose L P, et al. A Stable and Feasible Payoff Division for Coalition Formation in a Class of Task Oriented Domains [A]. Proc of the 8th Int Workshop on Intelligent Agents Ⅷ[C]. London: Springer-Verlag Press, 2002: 324-334.

共引文献22

同被引文献28

  • 1李德毅,刘常昱.论正态云模型的普适性[J].中国工程科学,2004,6(8):28-34. 被引量:932
  • 2李德毅,刘常昱,杜鹢,韩旭.不确定性人工智能[J].软件学报,2004,15(11):1583-1594. 被引量:416
  • 3王洪利,冯玉强.基于云模型具有语言评价信息的多属性群决策研究[J].控制与决策,2005,20(6):679-681. 被引量:72
  • 4苏兆品,蒋建国,夏娜,张国富.一种基于D-S证据理论的Agent联盟评价方法[J].模式识别与人工智能,2007,20(5):624-629. 被引量:9
  • 5MOLODTSOV D A. Soft set theory - first results [ J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 1999, 37(4/5) : 19 -31.
  • 6MAJI P K, BISWAS R, ROY A R. Fuzzy soft sets [ J]. Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 2001, 9(3) : 589 -602.
  • 7ATHAR K. Distance and similarity measures for soft sets [ J]. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, 2010, 6(3): 321 -324.
  • 8YANG W. New similarity measures for soft sets and their application [J]. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 2013, 5(1): 19 -25.
  • 9SAHIN R, KUCUK A. On similarity and entropy of neutrosophic soft sets [ J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 27 (5) : 2417 -2430.
  • 10LIU Z, QIN K, PEI Z. Similarity measure and entropy of fuzzy soft sets [J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014: 161607.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部