期刊文献+

疤痕子宫间隔1年内妊娠再次足月剖宫产102例分析 被引量:5

Analysis of 102 cases of repeat cesarean section within one year to previous
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨剖宫产后1年内妊娠再次足月剖宫产的安全性。方法:收集近3年深圳市福田区妇幼保健院及深圳福永人民医院收治的剖宫产术后1年内妊娠至足月的102例孕妇(研究组)及剖宫产术后2~3年妊娠至足月的100例孕妇(对照组)。分析孕妇再次妊娠距前次剖宫产的时间、再次妊娠的原因及此次妊娠的结局。结果:剖宫产术后1年内妊娠者多为4~11个月后妊娠,其终止妊娠方式均为剖宫产,其再次妊娠原因主要为未哺乳或母乳喂养少于4个月,未避孕或避孕失败;子宫下段厚度平均为(0.61±0.28)cm,与对照组(0.53±0.24cm)比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。研究组患者中盆腔粘连16例、前置胎盘5例、胎盘黏连3例、胎盘植入1例、产后出血6例、隐性子宫破裂2例,与对照组比较(分别为15例、1例、0例、0例、4例、0例),差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);两组的新生儿结局比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉O.05)。结论:剖宫产术1年内妊娠并维持至足月,并未增加新生儿风险,但其安全性需高度重视。对剖宫产产妇,需在产褥期做好宣教,指导避孕,最好于术后2年再孕,若短期内已妊娠者,应密切观察及时予以适当的产科处理。 Objective:To explore the safety for pregnant women in one year after cesar- ean section and cesarean section again. Method: 102 patients with term of pregnancy who ac- cepted cesarean section for less than 1 year and 200 cases with pregnancy after cesarean section 2 to 3 years were collected from recent 3 years from our hospital and Fuyong hospital. We ana- lyze its subsequent pregnancy from the time of previous cesarean section, pregnant reasons and the pregnant outcomes. Result: The time of these women was about 4 to 11 months after cesare- an section. The way of termination of pregnancy was cesarean section. Reasons of repeat preg- nancy due to not breastfeeding,less than 4 months breastfeeding, not contraception or contracep- tive failure, lower uterine segment thickness [ (0.61-+0.28 )cm ] compare to that in control group [ (0.53 - 0.24cm ) ] was significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). Pelvic adhesions ; placenta previa, placenta accrete,postpartum hemorrhage,and uterine rupture in group A as 16,5,3,1,6 and 2 cases respectively was no significant difference compare to that in control group( 15,1,0,0,4, and 0 cases respectively) (P〉0.05). Their neonatal outcome were no significant differences(P 〉0.05 ). Conclusion: Cesarean section within one year of pregnancy and maintain to term does not increase neonatal risk, but the safety need to be pay most attention. Women in puerperium need to a good guidance for contraception after cesarean section. It'had best pregnant more than 2 years after cesarean section. Shot term pregnancy should be closely observed and to provide appropriate obstetric management in a timely manner.
出处 《现代妇产科进展》 CSCD 2014年第9期713-715,共3页 Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 深圳市福田区公益基金资助项目(No:FTWS201336)
关键词 剖宫产术后 疤痕子宫 妊娠 子宫破裂 Alter cesarean section Scar uterus Pregnant opportunity Uterine rupture
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

共引文献178

同被引文献85

  • 1ACOG Practice bulletin no, 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[J], Obstet Gynecol, 2010,116(2 Pt 1):450- 463. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251.
  • 2Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean section(C-Obs 38 )[EB/OL ].( 2015-08-07) [2015-10-01].http://www.ranzcog.edu.au/college-statements guidelines.html#obstetrics.
  • 3Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155(Replaces guideline Number 147),February 2005[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005, 89(3):319-331.
  • 4Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. Green top Guideline No.45[EB/OL]. (2015-10-01)[2015 10-10]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/ globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg 45 .pdf.
  • 5Hauk L. Planning for labor and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Guidelines from the AAFP[J]. Am Faro Physician, 2015,91(3):197 198.
  • 6Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010,115(5):1003 1006. DOI: 10.1097/AOG, 0b013e3181d992fb.
  • 7Regan J, Keup C, Wolfe K, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean success in high-risk women: a population-based study[J]. J Perinatol, 2015,35(4):252-257. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.196.
  • 8Juhasz G, Gyamfi C, Gyamfi P, et al. Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2005,106(4):741-746. DOI: 10.1097/01 .AOG.0000177972.32941.65.
  • 9McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996,335(10):689 695. DOI: 10.1056/ NEJMI99609053351001.
  • 10Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001,345(1):3-8. DOI: 10. 1056/NEJM200107053450101.

引证文献5

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部