期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术肿瘤切除完整性及长期疗效的比较 被引量:24

Comparison of oncologic clearance and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open ;surgery in radical resection of rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术的肿瘤切除完整性及长期预后。方法回顾性分析2005年7月至2011年12月在上海第二军医大学长海医院肛肠外科行直肠癌根治手术的1184例患者的临床及随访资料,根据其手术方式分为腹腔镜手术组(腹腔镜组,104例)和开腹手术组(开腹组,1080例),对两组患者的一般情况、术中清扫淋巴结数目、远切缘距离、吻合口相关并发症发生率、术后无病生存率及总生存率进行比较。结果腹腔镜组与开腹组患者的临床资料具有可比性,两组平均清扫淋巴结数目(15.5枚/例比14.4枚/例)、远切缘平均距离(2.5 cm比2.1 cm)及吻合口相关并发症发生率[1.9%(2/104)比1.9%(20/1080)]差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹腔镜组术后3年和5年无病生存率分别为79.0%和69.3%,开腹组分别为78.0%和72.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹腔镜组术后3年和5年总体生存率分别为93.5%和81.2%,开腹组分别为87.6%和80.7%,差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论直肠癌腹腔镜手术肿瘤切除完整性和远期疗效与开腹手术相当。 Objective To compare the oncologic clearance and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 1184 cases with rectal cancer undergoing radical resection from July 2005 to December 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the surgical method , cases were divided into laparoscopy group (104 cases) and open group (1080 cases). Demographics, number of harvested lymph nodes, distance between distal margin and tumor, incidence of anastomotic complications, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in the number of harvested lymph nodes(15.5 vs. 14.4, P〉0.05), length of distal margin (2.5 cm vs. 2.1 cm, P〉0.05) and incidence of anastomotic complications (1.9% vs. 1.9%, P〉0.05) between the two groups. And there were no significant differences in DFS and OS between the two groups (both P〉0.05). The 3-year and 5-year DFS in laparoscopy group were 79.0% and 69.3%, and were 78.0% and 72.5% in open group. The 3-year and 5-year OS in laparoscopy group were 93.5% and 81.2%, which were 87.6% and 80.7% in open group. There were no significant differences in DFS and OS after stratification by TNM stage. Conclusion The oncologic clearence and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery are comparable with open surgery in radical resection of rectal cancer.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2014年第8期772-775,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81272561)
关键词 直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜 直肠癌根治术 远期疗效 Rectal neoplasms Laparoscopy Radical surgery Long-term outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献70

  • 1Fowler DL, White SA. Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resec- tion. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1:183-188.
  • 2Jacobs 1, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive co- lon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1:144-150.
  • 3Jacquet P, Averbach AM, Jacquet N. Abdominal wall me- tastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic- assisted colectomy for colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1995; 21:568-570.
  • 4Akle CA. Early parietal recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the colon after laparoscopic colectomy. Port site metastasis after laparascopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 1996; 83:427.
  • 5v Wexner SD, Cohen SM. Port site metastases after laparo- scopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 1995; 82:295-298.
  • 6Ramos JM, Gupta S, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW. Laparoscopy and colon cancer. Is the port site at risk? A preliminary report. Arch Surg 1994; 129: 897-899; dis- cussion 900.
  • 7Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM. Short-term endpoints of con- ventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365:1718-1726.
  • 8Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Tauri P, Piqu JM, Visa J. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359:2224-2229.
  • 9Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bon- jer HJ, Haglind E, Phlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Onco12005; 6:477-484.
  • 10Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK, Seto CL, Ho JW. Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative out- comes and survival. Ann Surg 2007; 245:1-7.

共引文献10

同被引文献186

  • 1Tony Wing Chung Mak,Janet Fung Yee Lee,Kaori Futaba,Sophie Sok Fei Hon,Dennis Kwok Yu Ngo,Simon Siu Man Ng.Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2014,6(6):184-193. 被引量:18
  • 2腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:277
  • 3张雪峰.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的无瘤技术[J].肿瘤学杂志,2006,12(6):454-456. 被引量:15
  • 4曹志新,徐向上,杨传永.直肠癌术中从根部结扎肠系膜下动脉临床意义探讨[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(12):942-944. 被引量:23
  • 5李向荣,彭顺秀,覃丽华,李英姿.腹腔镜手术气腹相关并发症的护理[J].家庭护士(下半月),2007,5(11):21-23. 被引量:34
  • 6Hinoi T, Okajima M, Shimomura M, et al. Effect of left colonic artery preservation on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer[ J]. World J Surg,2013,37 (12) :2935- 2943.
  • 7Prakash K,Varma D, Rajan M, et al. Laparoscopic colonic resection for rectosigmoid colonic tumours: a retrospective analysis and comparison with open resection [ J ]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2010,72 ( 4 ) : 318- 322.
  • 8Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Survival after laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10:44-52.
  • 9Kuhry E, Schwenk WJ, Gaupset R, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008, (2) :CD003432.
  • 10Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-term follow- up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2013,100: 75-82.

引证文献24

二级引证文献248

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部