期刊文献+

耳穴贴压联合系统护理干预预防脑卒中患者便秘的临床效果 被引量:13

Clinical effects of auricular application and comprehensivenursing intervention in stroke patients with constipation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨耳穴贴压联合系统护理干预在预防脑卒中患者便秘中的临床效果.方法:按照随机数字表法将我院收治的102例脑卒中患者均分为观察组和对照组,两组患者均给予耳穴贴压治疗,对照组给予常规护理,观察组在常规护理方法基础上实施系统护理干预模式,比较两组患者干预前后改良Rankin量表(modified Rankin seale,MRS)评分和排便量表评分变化情况以及便秘发生率.结果:两组患者干预后MRS评分均显著下降,与干预前比较(2.93±1.17 vs 3.58±0.86,3.20±1.22 vs 3.62±0.69),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者干预后MRS评分显著低于干预前(2.93±1.17 vs 3.20±1.22),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者干预后腹胀评分显著升高,口干和口臭评分显著降低,与干预前比较(0.29±0.60 vs 0.05±0.24、1.29±0.68 vs 2.12±0.80、1.18±0.55 vs 2.25±0.80,0.35±0.29 vs 0.06±0.17、1.36±0.77 vs 2.09±0.91、1.67±0.53 vs 2.26±0.81),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);观察组患者干预后腹胀、口干和口臭评分均显著低于对照组(0.29±0.60 vs 0.35±0.29、1.29±0.68 vs 1.36±0.77、1.18±0.55 vs 1.67±0.53),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者便秘发生率明显低于对照组(11.76%vs 21.57%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:耳穴贴压联合系统护理干预能够有效预防脑卒中后便秘的发生,具有较高临床应用和推广价值. AIM: To assess the clinical effects of auricular application and comprehensive nursing inter-vention in stroke patients with constipation.METHODS: One hundred and two stroke pa-tients with constipation were randomly divided into either an experiment group or a control group. All the patients were treated by auricu-lar application. On the basis of this treatment, the control group underwent routine nursing care, and the experiment group was given com-prehensive nursing intervention. The scores of modified Rankin scale(MRS), defecation scale and the rate of constipation were compared be-tween the two groups.RESULTS: In both groups, MRS score was sig-nificantly decreased after intervention compared with before intervention(2.93 ± 1.17 vs 3.58 ± 0.86, 3.20 ± 1.22 vs 3.62 ± 0.69, P〈0.05), and the decrease was more significant in the experiment group(2.93 ± 1.17 vs 3.20 ± 1.22, P〈0.05). In both groups, the score of abdominal distension was significantly increased and the scores of dry mouth and halitosis were significantly decreased after intervention compared with before inter-vention(0.29 ± 0.60 vs 0.05 ± 0.24, 1.29 ± 0.68 vs 2.12 ± 0.80; 1.18 ± 0.55 vs 2.25 ± 0.80, 0.35 ± 0.29 vs 0.06 ± 0.17; 1.36 ± 0.77 vs 2.09 ± 0.91, 1.67 ± 0.53 vs 2.26 ± 0.81; P〈0.05 or P〈0.01), and the changes in the scores of abdominal distension, dry mouth and halitosis were significantly lower in the experiment group than in the control group(0.29 ± 0.60 vs 0.35 ± 0.29, 1.29 ± 0.68 vs 1.36 ± 0.77, 1.18 ± 0.55 vs 1.67 ± 0.53, P〈0.05). The rate of constipation in the experiment group was significantly lower than that in the control group(11.76% vs 21.57%, P〈0.05).CONCLUSION: Auricular application and com-prehensive nursing intervention can improve the symptoms of constipation in stroke patients with constipation.
作者 黄萍 廖红梅
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第19期2800-2803,共4页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 耳穴贴压 系统护理干预 脑卒中 便秘 Auricular application Comprehensive nursing intervention Stroke Constipation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1缪虹,赵杨.卒中后便秘研究进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2011,13(10):257-259. 被引量:23
  • 2中华医学会神经病学分会神经康复学组,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组,卫生部脑卒中蹄查与防治工程委员会办公室.中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011完全版).中国康复理论与实践,2012,18:301-318.
  • 3中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.耳穴名称与定位.国家中医药管理局,,2009:1-65.
  • 4周思远,刘婷,覃海知,李瑛.临床常用便秘诊断和疗效评价量表的特征[J].世界华人消化杂志,2013,21(25):2611-2616. 被引量:89
  • 5中华医学会外科学分会肛肠外科学组.便秘症状及疗效评估.中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8:355.
  • 6中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组,中华医学会消化病学分会胃肠动力学组.中国慢性便秘诊治指南(,2013,武汉).胃肠病学,2013,18:605-612.
  • 7侯淑敏,陈长香.脑卒中患者便秘的原因分析及护理进展[J].护理实践与研究,2012,9(5):110-112. 被引量:20
  • 8Rentz AM, van Hanswijck de Jonge P, Leyendecker P, Hopp M. Observational, nonintervention, mul- ticenter study for validation of the Bowel Function Index for constipation in European countries. Curr Med Res Opin ,2011, 27:35-44 [PMID: 21083515 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.,2010.535270].
  • 9潘小丽.脑卒中患者便秘原因分析及对策[J].护理实践与研究,2013,10(10):73-74. 被引量:13
  • 10姜玥,宁文帅,李刚.脑卒中患者便秘的中医护理研究进展[J].解放军护理杂志,2010,27(11):839-840. 被引量:32

二级参考文献110

共引文献216

同被引文献118

引证文献13

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部