期刊文献+

基于逻辑推理的计算机试题评卷算法研究 被引量:4

Research on Computer Grading Algorithm based on Logical Reasoning
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 到目前为止,填空等试题的计算机评分方法,基本上是利用评分关键字与考生的答案匹配进行评分,评分结果并不理想。由于考生的答案多种多样,存在着不一致(inconsistent)或不确定(uncertain)的问题。R.Reiter缺省逻辑(default logic)推理可以有效地解决在不一致或不确定的情况下进行逻辑推理的问题。在N.D.Belnap四值逻辑的基础上,可将经典缺省逻辑推理推广到四值逻辑的双格结构上。将四值缺省推理应用到填空等试题的评分方法中,可使填空等试题的评分结果更加准确和科学。 So far, the grading methods of filling in the blanks and other topics are almost by matching keywords of grading with answers of examinee, and the results of grading are not satisfactory. Due to the answers of examinee with diversity, there are inconsistent or uncertain problems. The default reasoning by R. Reiter can effectively solve the problems of reasoning in the case of inconsistency or uncertainty. On the basis of four - valued logic by N.D. Belnap, the classic default logical reasoning can be extended to four - valued. The default reasoning based on four - valued can be used to grade filling in the blanks and other topic, so as to make the results of grading more accurate and scientific.
作者 贾志先
出处 《智能计算机与应用》 2014年第4期47-49,53,共4页 Intelligent Computer and Applications
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究新疆项目(14XJJAZH001)
关键词 四值逻辑 缺省逻辑 计算机评卷 Four - valued Logic Default Logic Computer Grading
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1邓又明,刘庆红,董光.试题库管理系统的分析与设计[J].现代情报,2005,25(4):157-158. 被引量:7
  • 2李美满,易德成.通用考试系统开放题库与组卷及评卷算法研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2005,26(10):2743-2745. 被引量:25
  • 3王邯 冯刚 肖俊.网络教育中C程序设计自适应考试系统的设计和实现 [EB/OL].http://www.cec.edu.cn/elearning/2001nh/3-6.doc,2002-11-20.
  • 4臧铁刚,冷晟,钱晓明,等.软件工程[M].中国铁道出版社,2007.
  • 5Timothy C Lethbridge Robert langaniere.面向对象软件工程[M].机械工业出版社,2001.
  • 6Arieli O.. Paraconsistent preferential reasoning by signed quantified boolean formulae. In: Proceedings of the ECAI, Valencia, Spain, 2004, 773~777.
  • 7Marek V.W., Treur J., Truszcynski M.. Representation theory for default logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 1997,21(2~4): 343~358.
  • 8Delgrande J.P., Schaub T.. On the relation between Reiter's default logic and its (major) variants. In:Proceedings of the Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, Aalborg, Denmark, 2003, 452~463.
  • 9Imielinski T.. Results on translating defaults to circumscription. Artificial Intelligence, 1987,32(1): 131~146.
  • 10Delgrande J.P., Schaub T.. Expressing preferences in default logic. Artificial Intelligence, 2000,123(1~2): 41~87.

共引文献55

同被引文献7

  • 1John Walkenbach. Excel 2010 power programming with VBA [ M ]. Wiley publishing, Inc. , Indianapolis, Indiana, 2010.
  • 2Bill Jelen, Tracy Syrstad. VBA and Macros: microsoft excel 2010 [M]. Que Corporation, U. S. , 2010.
  • 3Microsoft公司.MicrosoftvisualbasicforapplicationsandsharedLi—brariesReference与共享库参考手册(上下)[M].北京:希望电子出版社,1999.
  • 4DavidShank等著.Microsoftoffice2000visualbasicprogrammerguide程序员指南[M].北京:希望电子出版社,1999.
  • 5《ExcelVBA从入门到精通》编委会.ExcelVBA从入门到精通[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2013.
  • 6REITER R. A logic for defauh reasoning [ J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1980, 13(1&2) :81 -132.
  • 7贾志先.计算机文化基础考试系统的开发与应用[J].计算机应用,2001,21(7):60-61. 被引量:15

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部