期刊文献+

苏芬太尼和芬太尼用于术后镇痛的效果观察 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较苏芬太尼和芬太尼术后镇痛效果差异,为临床术后镇痛提供借鉴.方法 将ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级腹腔镜手术患者60例按数字表法随机分为术后镇痛苏芬太尼组30例和术后镇痛芬太尼组30例,两组患者术后均给予镇痛泵止痛,苏芬太尼组(S组)泵中镇痛液为150 μg苏芬太尼加0.9%氯化钠注射液至100 mL,芬太尼组(F组)泵中镇痛液为150 mg芬太尼加0.9%氯化钠注射液至100 mL,检测术后5、15、30、60 min脉搏氧饱和度(SpO2)的变化情况,采用视觉模拟评分进行患者术后2、8、16、48 h疼痛评分,记录术后并发症发生情况.结果 苏芬太尼组术后2、8、16、48 h疼痛评分明显低于芬太尼组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.203、3.162、3.733、3.668,均P<0.05);苏芬太尼组术后5、15、30、60 min脉搏氧饱和度明显高于芬太尼组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.664、3.734、3.883、3.033,均P<0.05).结论 腹腔镜手术后镇痛使用苏芬太尼的效果优于优于芬太尼,具有更强的镇痛效果及更好的安全性,值得临床推广使用.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2014年第18期2835-2836,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1张焰,钱红娣,沈志耘,吴长毅,杨定清.不同镇痛方法对开胸手术病人术后肺内分流及氧代谢的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(9):705-706. 被引量:14
  • 2罗玉琳,郁葱,张青,饶静玲.舒芬太尼与芬太尼复合异丙酚静脉麻醉的比较[J].重庆医学,2005,34(2):240-241. 被引量:77
  • 3姚彤,吴新民,应舜伟.舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于术后硬膜外病人自控镇痛[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(3):157-160. 被引量:34
  • 4[1]Bailey PL,Streisand JB,East KA,et al.Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid-induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil.Anesth analg,1990,70:8-15.
  • 5[2]Geller E,Chrubasik J,Graf R,et al.A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural or epidural sufentanil versus intravenous sufentanil or epidural fentanyl analgesia after major abdominal surgery.Anesth analg,1993,76:1243-1250.
  • 6Clotz MA,Nahata MC.Clinical uses of fentanyl,sufentanil and alfentanil[J].Clin Pharm,1996,10:581.
  • 7Mccollum JSC,Dundee JW.Comparision of the inducrion characteristics of four intravenous anesthetic agents[J].Anaesthesia,1994,41:995.
  • 8Bailey PL.Sufentanil produces shorter lasting respiratory depression and longer lasting analgesia than equipotent doses of fentanyl in human volunteers[J]. Anesthesiology,1999,65:A439.
  • 9Cleays MA,Gepts E,Camu F.Haemodynamic changes during anaesthesia induced and maintained with propofol [J].Br J Anaesth,1998,60:3.
  • 10Janssen PAJ.Potent,new analgesics,tailor—made for different purposes [J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1998.26:253.

共引文献299

同被引文献35

  • 1田玉科,梅伟.超声定位神经阻滞图谱[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:175.
  • 2Lim Y, Ocampo CE, Supandji M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of threepatien-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for la- bor[ J ]. Anesth Analg,2008,107 (6) : 1968-1972.
  • 3Netter FH. Back and spinal Cord. In : Netter FH, ed. Atlas of hu- mananatomy summit [ J ]. New Jersey, USA : The Ciba-Geigy Cor- paration, 1989,1 ( 1 ) : 145-155.
  • 4Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, et al. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves:a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall[J]. Clin Anat,2008,21 (4) :325- 333.
  • 5ODonnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdo- minis plane ( TAP ) block in open retmpubic prostateetomy [ J ]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2006,31 ( 1 ) :91-98.
  • 6Gharaei H, Imani F, Almasi F, et al. The effect of ultrasound- guided TAPBon pain management after total abdominal hysterec- tomy[ J]. Korean J Pain,2013,26(4) :374-378.
  • 7Hebbard P. Subeostal transversus abdominis plane block underul- trasound guidance [ J ]. Anesth Analg ,2008,106 ( 2 ) :674-675.
  • 8Shibata Y, Sato Y, Fujiwara Y, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block [ J 1. Anesth Analg ,2007,105 (3) :883.
  • 9Kadam VR, Moran JL. Epidural infusion sversustransversus abdo- minisplane ( TAP ) block infusions : retrospective study [ J ]. J Anesth ,2011,25 ( 5 ) :786-787.
  • 10Favuzza J, Brady K, Delaney CP. Transversus abdominis plane blocks and enhanced recovery pathways : making the 23 -h hospital stay a realistic goal afterlaparoscopic col orectal surgery[ J]. Surg Endosc ,2013,27 (7) :2481-2486.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部