期刊文献+

胸腰段多椎体不稳定骨折内固定方式的选择 被引量:5

Internal fixation options for unstable thoracolumbar multiple-level spinal fractures
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨胸腰段多椎体不稳定骨折内固定手术方式的选择。方法对2010年3月至2013年11月东莞市石龙人民医院和东莞市高埗医院收治的110例胸腰段多椎体不稳定骨折患者采取不同的内固定手术方式,其中长节段固定组42例、短节段固定组38例、前路固定组30例。比较3组术前、术后即刻及末次随访时伤椎椎体前缘高度、后凸角度以及疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)的差异。结果110例患者随访6~18个月,平均随访时间(12.3±2.1)个月。各组患者术前、术后即刻、末次随访不同时相点伤椎椎体前缘高度和后凸角度比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中术后即刻和末次随访时椎体前缘高度和后凸角度均较术前明显改善(P<0.05),而术后即刻与末次随访时比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),椎体前缘高度和后凸角度未见明显丢失。末次随访时3组VAS及ODI评分均较术前明显下降(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论根据骨折类型及脊髓损伤情况选择合理的内固定方式,对胸腰段多椎体不稳定骨折患者进行个体化治疗,可获得满意的临床效果。 Objective To discuss the internal fixation options for unstable thoracolumbar multiple-level spinal fractures (MSF). Methods From March 2010 to November 2013, 110 patients with unstable thoracolumbar MSF were treated surgically in Shilong People's Hospital and Gaobu Hospital of Dongguan City. According to different internal fixation techniques, they were divided into 3 group, posterior long-segment fixation group (n =42), posterior short-segment fixation group (n = 38) and anterior internal fixation group (n = 30). At preoperation, postoperation and the latest follow-up, the differences of anterior vertebral body height, kyphotic angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were compared among 3 groups. Results All patients were followed up for 6 to 18 months, with the average of (12.3 ± 2.1) months. Differences of anterior vertebral body height and kyphotic angle in 3 groups had statistical significance among different timepoints (P〈0.05), in which the above parameters at postoperation and the last follow-up improved significantly compared with preoperative ones (P 〈0.05), while there was no statistical difference between postoperation and the last follow-up (P 〉0.05), no obvious loss of anterior vertebral body height or kyphotic angle were found. Also, compared with preoperative ones, VAS, ODI scores at the latest follow-up all achieved significant improvement (P 〈0.05), while there was no statistical difference among 3 groups (P 〉0.05). Conclusion Through individualized treatment according to fracture types and damage of spinal cord, reasonable internal fixation options for unstable thoracolumbar MSF could obtain satisfied clinical effects.
出处 《中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志》 2014年第3期149-153,共5页 Chinese Orthopaedic Journal of Clinical and Basic Research
关键词 胸椎 腰椎 脊柱骨折 关节不稳定性 骨折固定术 Thoracic vertebrae Lumbar vertebrae Spinal fractures Joint instability Fracture fixation,internal
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1梁鹤,田纪伟.多节段脊柱骨折的特点及治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(8):784-786. 被引量:12
  • 2Korres DS, Boscainos PJ, Papagelopoulos PJ, et al. Multiple level noncontiguous fractures of the spine [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, (411): 95-102.
  • 3Gupta A, el Masri WS. Multilevel spinal injuries: incidence, distribution and neurological pattems [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1989, 71(4): 692-695.
  • 4Myles PS, Troedel S, Boquest M, et al. The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear? [J]. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89(6): 1517-1520.
  • 5Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability question- naire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire [J]. Spine, 2000, 25(24): 3115-3124.
  • 6党洪胜,赵猛,严永祥,刘家国,张劲松,徐圣康,罗斌.胸腰椎多节段脊柱骨折的诊治分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2008,22(12):1441-1444. 被引量:29
  • 7李晶,吕国华,王冰,卢畅,康意军,马泽民,邓幼文,陈飞,刘伟东.胸腰椎骨折脱位伤椎固定的可行性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(5):293-296. 被引量:231
  • 8Riaz-ur-Rehman, Azmatullah, Azam F, et al. Treatment of traumatic unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures with transpedicular screw fixation [J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2011, 61 (10): 1005-1008.
  • 9贾连顺,宋海涛.胸腰椎损伤的分类[J].临床骨科杂志,2000,3(4):316-318. 被引量:11
  • 10唐三元,陈庄洪,徐永年,余斌,赵军.多节段脊柱骨折的分类及相关问题研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1995,2(4):238-239. 被引量:51

二级参考文献74

共引文献391

同被引文献71

  • 1吴树华,王树金,王遥伟,周立健.伤椎单侧置钉治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2013,16(1):9-1. 被引量:8
  • 2袁强,田伟,张贵林,刘波,行勇刚,李勤,胡临,李志宇.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222. 被引量:310
  • 3王义生,杨春喜.酒精性骨质疏松症研究进展[J].河南医学研究,2007,16(1):77-83. 被引量:13
  • 4邵玉,邓伟民.从瘀血证论治原发性骨质疏松症[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2007,13(7):524-526. 被引量:18
  • 5Xu G,Fu X,Du C,et al.Biomechanical comparison of mono-segment transpedicular fixation with short-segment fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures:a finite element analysis[J].Proc Inst Mech Eng H,2014,228(10):1005-1013.
  • 6Kim GW,Jang JW,Hur H,et al.Predictive factors for a kyphosis recurrence following short-segment pedicle screw fixation including fractured vertebral body in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures[J].J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2014,56(3):230-236.
  • 7Moussazadeh N,Rubin DG,Mclaughlin L,et al.Short-segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with cement augmentation for tumor-induced spinal instability[J].Spine J,2015,15(7):1609-1617.
  • 8Uzumcugil O, Dogan A, Yetis M, et al. Results of two above- one below approach with intermediate screws at the fracture site in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst frac- tures[J]. Kobe J Med Sci,2010,56(2) :67 -78.
  • 9Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G, et al. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American spinal injury association [ J ]. Spinal Cord, 1997,35 (5) :266 - 274.
  • 10Machino M, Yukawa Y, ho K, et al. Posterior/anterior com- bined surgery for thoracolumbar burst fractures - posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws and laminar hooks, an- terior decompression and strut grafting [ J ]. Spinal Cord, 2011,49 (4) : 573 - 579.

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部