期刊文献+

平面应变断裂韧度评定中临界载荷研究 被引量:2

Study on critical load for assessing plane strain fracture toughness
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对新版断裂韧性测试规范扩大的裂纹长度适用范围,利用有限元精细分析用于平面应变断裂韧度KIC评定中割线法确定临界载荷PQ的相对割线斜率ΔS的合理性,提出0.45≤a/W≤0.7范围内的相对割线斜率ΔS的表达式。结果表明:现行规范推荐的相对割线斜率ΔS不再适合于确定0.55<a/W≤0.7范围内的临界载荷PQ,其最大相对误差已近8%。 In the new version of the test standards for KIC determination, the expanded range of crack size was given. In this field, the reasonability of relative secant slope △Sused for the determination of critical load PQ was investigated on the basis of the refined finite element analysis. An expression for the relative secant slope △Swithin the range of a/W from 0.45 to 0.7 was proposed. The results show that, the relative secant slope AS recommended by current test standards is not suitable to determine critical load PQ when a/W is between 0.55 and 0.7, the maximum relative error reaches to 8%.
出处 《中国测试》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第1期21-24,共4页 China Measurement & Test
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(11072205)
关键词 断裂韧度 临界载荷 割线法 标定因子 相对割线斜率 有限元分析 fracture toughness critical load secant method calibration factor relative secantslope finite element analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献27

  • 1郭珉,朱秀荣,王荣.颗粒增强铝基复合材料断裂韧度研究[J].特种铸造及有色合金,2004,24(6):32-33. 被引量:9
  • 2黄明初,尹志民,王涛.超高强铝合金紧凑拉伸法断裂韧性测试方法探讨[J].轻合金加工技术,2005,33(11):41-45. 被引量:1
  • 3Srivatsan T S,Alhajri M,Vasudevan V K.Cyclic plastic strain response and fracture behavior of 2009 aluminum alloy metal-matrix composite[J].International Journal of Fatigue,2005,27:357.
  • 4Thomas M P,King J E.Effect of thermal and mechanical processing on tensile properties of powder formed 2124 aluminum and 2124 Al-SiCp metal matrix composite[J].Materials science and Teclmology,1993,9:742.
  • 5Flom Y,Arsananlt R J.Effect of particle size on fracture toughness of SiC/Al composite material[J].Acta Metall.,1989,37:2423.
  • 6[1]Timofeev B T, Blumin A A, Anikovsky ⅤⅤ. Fracture toughness of low carbon steels and their weldments. Int. J. of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1998, 75: 945 ~ 950.
  • 7[2]Putatunda Susil K. Fracture toughness of high carbon and high silicon steel. Materials Science and Engineering, 2001, A297:31 ~ 43.
  • 8[3]Tahtinen S, Laukkanen A, Singh B N. Damage mechanisms and fracture toughness of GlidCop(R) CuAl25 IGO copper alloy. J. of Nuclear Materials, 2000, 283~287:1028~1032.
  • 9[4]Nagal G, Blauel J G. Evaluation of the standard master curve for fracture toughness determination. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1999, 190:159~169.
  • 10[5]Lambrigger M. Master curve for brittle cleavage fracture toughness testing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1996, 55(4):677~678.

共引文献33

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部