期刊文献+

温度对气层气体钻井井壁稳定的影响 被引量:4

Influence of Temperature on Wellbore Stability during Gas Drilling through Gas Formations
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 气体钻井过程中气体经过钻头喷嘴后产生焦耳-汤姆逊冷却效应,导致井底温度远小于地层温度。当气层被钻开后井壁围岩温度、孔隙压力和应力分布发生改变,容易引起井下复杂事故。为此,分析了井底低温对致密砂岩气藏气体钻井井壁稳定的影响。研究表明,井眼钻开后井底低温产生拉热应力,使近井壁有效应力减小,有利于防止岩石剪切失稳,但增加了岩石产生拉伸破坏的可能。气层气体产出使近井壁地层孔隙度和渗透率减小,不考虑井底低温时减小程度偏大。气体钻井近井壁可能存在塑性区,低温使塑性区向地层延伸更容易导致井壁失稳。塑性区的形成不仅取决于水平地应力,而且与垂向地应力有关。通常致密砂岩气藏埋藏较深,垂向应力影响大,其弹塑性分析需考虑三维主应力的影响。 Joule-Thomson cooling effect in gas drilling causes a significant temperature drop at bit.Large changes in pore pressure,temperature,and the stress state when drilling through high pressure gas reservoirs normally lead to downhole problems.The influence of low temperature on wellbore stability during gas drilling was investigated.The results reveal that low bottom hole temperature tends to decrease the effective radial and tangential stresses suggesting enhanced wellbore stability with respect to shear failure,whereas low temperature of gas also increases the potential for tensile failure.Porosity and permeability drops of near wellbore are captued as a result of high pressue gas outburst from formations,and those drops are more pronounced without consideration of low bottom hole temperature.Gas formations may undergo plastic deformation during gas drilling,and the plastic zone expands further into the formation due to low temperature further aggravating wellbore stability.The formation of plastic zone depends not only on the horizontal stress but on vertical stress.Generally due to deep burial depth of tight sandstone gas reservoirs,elastoplastic analysis demands consideration of full three principal in-situ stresses.
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2014年第19期25-29,共5页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(51134004)资助
关键词 气体钻井 井壁稳定 温度 有效应力 塑性 gas drilling wellbore stability temperature effective stress plasticity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1聂臻,夏柏如,邹灵战,邓金根.气体钻井井壁稳定性模型的建立[J].天然气工业,2011,31(6):71-76. 被引量:15
  • 2仉洪云,高德利,郭柏云.气体钻井井底岩石热应力分析[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(1):70-74. 被引量:7
  • 3Zhang I-I, Zhang H, Guo B, et al. Analytical and numerical model- ing reveals the mechanism of rock failure in gas UBD. Journal of Nat- ural Gas Science and Engineering, 2012; 4:29-34.
  • 4Ghassemi A, Tao Q, Dick A. Influence of coupled chemo-poro-ther- moelastic processes on pore pressure and stress distributions around a wellbore in swelling shale. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engi- neering, 2009; 67(1) : 57-64.
  • 5Zhou Y, Rajapakse R, Graham J. A coupled thermoporoelastic modelwith thermo-osmosis and thermal-filtration. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1998 ; 35 (34) : 4659-4683.
  • 6王茜,张烈辉,钱治家,刘胜军,任德雄.考虑科林贝尔效应的低渗、特低渗气藏数学模型[J].天然气工业,2003,23(6):100-102. 被引量:16
  • 7Liu J, Chen Z, Elsworth D, et al. Evaluation of stress-controlled coalswelling processes. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2010 ; 83(4) : 446-455.
  • 8Yu Maohong, Li Jianchun. Computational Plasticity: with Emphasis on the Application of the Unified Strength Theory. Hangzhou: Zhe- jiang University Press, 2012:92-95.
  • 9Roshan H, Rahman S S. Analysis of pore pressure and stress distri- bution around a wellbore drilled in chemically active elastoplastic for- mations. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011; 44 (5): 541-552.
  • 10Lu A Z, Xu G, Sun F, et al. Elasto-plastic analysis of a circular tunnel including the effect of the axial in situ stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010; 47 ( 1 ) : 50-59.

二级参考文献39

共引文献35

同被引文献76

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部