摘要
本文从发生学、题材学和诗学等方面对道家文学和浪漫主义进行了比较研究。作者认为,中国古代不曾发生过浪漫主义文学运动;所谓庄子是中国古代浪漫主义理论家、屈原和李白是中国古代浪漫主义诗人的提法是一种牵强附会。而“现实主义和浪漫主义两大基本创作方法”其实是中西文化碰撞中“写实与虚幻想象”两种写作手法的概念偏移。
This essay makes a comparative study of the Taoist Literature and Romanticism from the historical, thematic and poetic points of view. The author maintains that there was no romantic literary movement in ancient China. Zhuangzi is said to be an ancient romantic theorist; Qu Yuan and Li Bai are reputed to be the romantic poets in ancient China. This opinion is not reasonable. And as a matter of fact, 'Realism and Romanticism as the two basic creative methods' are a conception shift from the realistic and imaginative creative methods in the conflict between Chinese and Western cultures.
出处
《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2002年第4期50-60,共11页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
