期刊文献+

论21世纪的中美战略关系 被引量:1

On Sino-US Strategic Relationship in the 21st Century
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 冷战结束以来,中美战略关系的基础和环境都发生了很大的变化。在经济和一些非军事领域,两国的战略性合作不断扩大和加强,同时,在台湾问题、人权和国家导弹防御等领域的战略性分歧也逐渐凸现出来,不断发生的危机已严重影响到两国总体关系大局。显而易见,中美战略关系需要重新定位。正确理解和判断两国战略关系是必要的,而更为重要的是采取积极有效的措施,稳定和扩大中美合作领域,稳定和缩小战略性分歧,建立建设性战略对话机制。从战略高度判断和处理一些个案对于中美关系和世界和平都具有深远的安全、政治和经济意义。 Since the end of the Cold War, the foundation and environment of Sino-US strategic relationship have undergone significant changes. While bilateral strategic cooperation in economic and non-military fields is strengthening, strategic disputes between the two countries gradually emerge with respect to Taiwan Question, human rights, national defense, and etc. Sequent crises caused in the last decade have negatively and seriously affected the overall bilateral ties. The reshaping of Sino-US strategic relationship is on the agenda. It is necessary for us to understand and judge this relationship correctly, and we should not only stabilize and expand cooperation space but also decrease strategic disputes by setting up constructive regime for strategic dialogue. To determine and deal with specific cases at strategic level has profound security, political and economic implications for Sino-US relations and world peace.
作者 郭学堂
出处 《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第2期34-41,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金 本文得到同济大学人文社会科学基金资助
关键词 中美关系 对外战略 国际政治 Sino-US Relations Foreign Strategy International Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Jim Mann: On China, No Return to Nixon Era, LATimes, Feb. 7,2001.
  • 2[3]Harry Harding: Smooth Sailing Now, But Don't Be Sure It Will Last, International Herald Tribune, Oct. 18,2001.
  • 3[6]美国专家学者中有许多担心亚洲国家因美国NMD计划而"核化"的问题,并对NMD计划提出批评.有关文章可重点参阅:Joseph Cirincione:The Asian Nuclear Reaction Chain, Foreign Policy, Spring 2000, pp. 120 ~ 136; John Deuth,Harold Brown, and John P. White: National Missile Defense: Is There Another Way? Foreign Policy, Summer 2000, pp.91 ~100; Lgor Ivanov: The Missile-Defense Mistake: Undermining Strategic Stability and ABM Treaty, Foreign Affairs, Sept./Oct,Vol.79. NO.5, pp.15~20 Samuel R. Berger: Is This Shield Necessary?, Washington Post, Feb. 13, 2001.
  • 4[8]John J. Mearsheimer: The Future of the American Pacifier,Foreign Affairs, September/October 2001. P. 55.
  • 5[11]Quadrennial Defense Review, Defense Department of the United States, Sept.31 2001.P.4.
  • 6[14]Richard Holbrooke: A Defining Moment With China,Washington Post,January 2,2002;有关签署第四个联合公报不合时宜的美国声音,可参阅Letterstothe Editor of Washington Post, Our Relations With China, by William R. Hawkins and James Lilley, January 7,2002; James Mann: We Don't Need a New Accord With China, Washington Post, January 11,2002.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部