期刊文献+

中国古代优先权论略——概念·源流·种类 被引量:7

On Priority of Claim of Ancient Times in China—Connotation·Origin·Variety
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 优先权制度之创设主旨是破除债权之平等原则 ,实现实质上的平等 ,是正义理念在民事法律制度领域自我注塑的结果。本文旨在考察中国古代优先权之产生演变过程及其外在制度设置与内蕴理据 ,认为优先权体系是中国古代民间经济生活自发产生的有效调控机制并直接影响了中国传统社会组织结构。在分析归纳现行西方民法体系优先权概念基础上 ,对中国现行民事法律体系 (含台湾地区民事法律 )之优先权范围进行比较并上溯古代中国之优先权体系 ,认为中国古代优先权由优先承买权与优先受偿权两种优先权构成 ,对之加以挖掘 ,不唯有利于还原历史 ,更可从中开发出近。 The system on priority, resulting from the self perfection of the idea of justice in civil law systems, has the function of overstepping the equality principal of law of obligation and reacing the real equality. This thesis emphasizes on the originality, development and the regulation systems as well as its theories of priority. It holds that the system of priority, which has a direct influence on Chinese traditional social structure, is an effective regulating system spontaneously developed from the folk economic activities of ancient China. On the basis of analyzing the current connotation of the priority in western civil law system, and through the comparison of the scope of the priority in our ancient and current civil law system (including Taiwan), it puts forward that the priority of ancient China consists of the option to purchase and the priority of claim. Study on it not only reflects the real history, but also develops the spirit of civil law of modern and contemporary times.
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第3期83-88,共6页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 古代 优先权 习惯法价值 ancient times priority the value of customary law
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1M*魏因贝格尔.制度法论[M].周叶谦译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.
  • 2M*D*贝勒斯.法律的原则[M].张文显,等译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.
  • 3劳伦斯.M.弗里德曼,傅郁林.法治、现代化和司法[J].北大法律评论,1998(1):280-309. 被引量:27
  • 4近江幸治 祝娅译.担保物权法[M].北京:法律出版社,2000..
  • 5王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究(第一册)[M].台湾:三民书局,1993.
  • 6郑玉波.民商法问题研究(第一册)[M].台湾:三民书局,1991.
  • 7徐扬杰.宋明家族制度史论[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
  • 8编辑组.民事习惯调查报告录(上册)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.

共引文献38

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部