摘要
20世纪 80年代在我国哲学界开展的实践问题的讨论 ,提出了“实践本体论”、“实践唯物主义”、“实践超越论”等不同的观点。这些观点虽不乏深刻与睿智 ,但也不难看出以往对实践问题的研究还存在着缺陷与不足 ,因为这些观点基本上还是局限在传统实践观的基础上 ,将马克思的实践观仅仅归结为生产实践 ,而没有进一步研究马克思实践观变革的内容 ,没有说明马克思实践观同传统实践观的原则区别。马克思的实践观是以人的解放和自由全面发展为核心的实践观 ,是对道德实践观与生产实践观的超越。
In 1980s, a discussion of issues on practice was launched in the philosophical society in China and the results were inspiring. Such different views as 'practice ontology', 'practical materialism' and 'practical transcendence' were put forward. Although they provided a deep and talented touch into the issue of practice, the shortcomings were obvious in the studies of the former practical problems. The reason for this is that the discussion of the position of practice in Marxist philosophy is essentially based on traditional practical views. It does not provide deep research and study into the contents of Marxist practical view reforms or a clear demonstration of the distinctions between Marxist practical views and those traditional ones. In the present essay, through the analysis of 'practice ontology', 'practical materialism' and 'practical transcendence', it is argued that Marxist practical views surmount the traditional ones.
出处
《吉林大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第3期19-24,共6页
Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金
吉林大学人文社会科学基金项目 (2 0 0 0ZX0 32 )
关键词
道德实践观
生产实践观
马克思实践观
moral practical view
production practical view
Marxist practical view
