期刊文献+

腹腔镜技术在异位妊娠治疗中的应用价值 被引量:32

Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy.
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 评价腹腔镜技术在异位妊娠治疗中的应用价值。 方法 回顾分析我院 1999年 1月 - 2 0 0 1年 12月期间 5 0 9例异位妊娠手术治疗方式的变化 ,选择 2 0 0 1年无低血容量性休克的腹腔镜手术 6 0例与同期开腹手术 5 8例做对照 ,比较 2组的手术时间、术后住院日、体温恢复天数、输液日及手术费用等。 结果 腹腔镜治疗病例 1999年 3例 ,2 0 0 0年 2 3例 ,2 0 0 1年 6 0例 ,后两年比 1999年分别增加13 7%和 39 4 %。腹腔镜组与开腹组的手术时间分别为 (6 6 .3± 2 5 .3)分和 (75 .9± 2 2 .0 )分 (t=- 2 .0 2 ,P=0 .0 3) ;术后发热 (1.5± 1.7)天和 (2 .8± 1.6 )天 (t=- 4 .2 7,P =0 .0 0 ) ;术后住院日 (3.3± 1.9)天和 (5 .1± 1.7)天 (t=- 5 .4 2 ,P =0 .0 0 ) ;住院总费用 (7318.4± 14 4 0 .1)元和 (5 5 6 7.8± 15 6 7.8)元 (t=6 .32 ,P =0 .0 0 )。 结论 腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠优于开腹手术。如经济条件允许 。 Objective To study the value of laparoscopic operation in the management of ectopic pregnancy. Methods The management of 509 cases of ectopic pregnancy reviewed retrospectively in our hospital from January 1999 to December 2001.Selected 60 cases treated by laparoscopy in 2001 were compared with 58 cases treated by laparotomy without hypovolemia shock.Operating time, postoperative hospital stay, time returning to normal temperature,total cost were compared. Results Laparoscopic surgery was performed in three cases in 1999,twenty three cases in 2000 and sixty cases in 2001. Comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomy group showed the operating time (66.3±25.3) min vs (75.9±22.0)min( t =-2.02, P =0.03);postoperative hospital stay (3.3±1.9)days vs (5.1±1.7)days( t =-5.42, P =0.00); total cost (7318.4±1440.1) RMB vs (5567.8±1567.8) RMB ( t =6.32, P =0.00). Conclutions Laparoscopic surgery is superior to laparotomy in the management of ectopic pregnancy.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2002年第3期160-161,共2页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 开腹手术 异位妊娠 对比分析 Laparoscopy laparotomy ectopic pregnancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1高濑幸子 他.腹腔鏡施行時的中心静派壓的變動にっぃて[J].日產婦内視鏡學會杂誌,1989,5:31-31.
  • 2Ghosh S, mann C, Khan K, et al. Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy. SeminLaparpsc Surg. 1999, 6:68-72.
  • 3Pittaway DE, Takacs P, Bauguess P. Laparoscopic adnerectomy: A comparson withLaparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994, 171:385 - 391.
  • 4Dawood MY. Laparoscopic surgery of the fallopian tubes and ovaries. Semin LaparoscSurg, 1999, 6:58-67.
  • 5Lundorff P,Thorburn J,Hahlin M,et al.Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica . 1991
  • 6Seifer DB,Gutmann JN,Grant WD,et al.Comparison of persistent ectopic pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology . 1993
  • 7Ankum WM,Mol BW,van der Veen F,et al.Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility . 1996
  • 8Murphy AA,Nager CW,Wujek JJ,et al.Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertility and Sterility . 1992
  • 9Gray DT,Thorburn J,Lundorff P,et al.A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. The Lancet . 1995
  • 10Mol BW,Hajenius PJ,Ankum WM,et al.Screening for ectopic pregnancy in symptom-free women at increased risk. Obstetrics and Gynecology . 1997

共引文献20

同被引文献111

引证文献32

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部