期刊文献+

关于奥陶纪“茅坪组” 被引量:1

ABOUT THE ORDOVICIAN MAOPING FORMATION OF CHINA
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 The Maoping Formation was named respectively and used for two different and unrelated 1ithological units. In 1966 the name was proposed by Wei Xiu zhe and others to define a suite of slightly metamorphosed slates of Early Ordovician age in Chongyi, Souhern Jiangxi. However, in 1968 the same term was used by Hubei Geological Survey for a suite of dolomites of Middle Cambrian age in Xianfeng, West Hubei, probably without having knowledge of this Homonymum. Unfortunately this name has since been used for decades separately by Cambrian and Ordovician biostratigraphers causing serious confusion, which will be clarified and discussed herein. According to the priority rule, the later name is invalid and should not be used again, and it is here suggested that a new name should be given to the Cambrian rock unit concerned. Lithologically Maoping Formation is also shown to be different from Jueshangou Formation defined for the Jinggang Mts. to the north of Chongyi region, and from Yinchufu Formation in Western Zhejiang. Therefore the term is regarded as valid, restricted to southern Jiangxi. Up to date, quite abundant but poorly preserved graptolites have been discovered from the rocks, indicating an age of early Tremadoc to possibly earliest Arenig age (Early Ordovician). The Maoping Formation was named respectively and used for two different and unrelated 1ithological units. In 1966 the name was proposed by Wei Xiu zhe and others to define a suite of slightly metamorphosed slates of Early Ordovician age in Chongyi, Souhern Jiangxi. However, in 1968 the same term was used by Hubei Geological Survey for a suite of dolomites of Middle Cambrian age in Xianfeng, West Hubei, probably without having knowledge of this Homonymum. Unfortunately this name has since been used for decades separately by Cambrian and Ordovician biostratigraphers causing serious confusion, which will be clarified and discussed herein. According to the priority rule, the later name is invalid and should not be used again, and it is here suggested that a new name should be given to the Cambrian rock unit concerned. Lithologically Maoping Formation is also shown to be different from Jueshangou Formation defined for the Jinggang Mts. to the north of Chongyi region, and from Yinchufu Formation in Western Zhejiang. Therefore the term is regarded as valid, restricted to southern Jiangxi. Up to date, quite abundant but poorly preserved graptolites have been discovered from the rocks, indicating an age of early Tremadoc to possibly earliest Arenig age (Early Ordovician).
作者 张元动
出处 《地层学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2002年第2期135-136,共2页 Journal of Stratigraphy
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目 ( G2 0 0 0 0 7770 0 ) 自然科学基金 ( No.4990 2 0 0 1)资助
关键词 茅坪组 下奥陶统 中寒武统 江西 湖北 Maoping Formation, Early Ordovician, Middle Cambrian, Jiangxi, Hubei
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1江西省地质矿产厅.江西省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.278-290.
  • 2项礼文 朱兆玲 等.中国地层典 寒武系[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.1-95.
  • 3汪啸风 陈旭 等.中国地层典 奥陶系[M].北京:地质出版社,1966.1-126.
  • 4江啸风 倪世钊 等.长江三峡地区生物地层(2).早古生代分册[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.1-641.
  • 5李积金.江西崇义早奥陶世的几种笔石[J].古生物学报,1984(5):578-585. 被引量:3
  • 6李积金 肖承协 等.江西崇义早奥陶世宁国期典型太平洋笔石动物群.中国古生物志,新乙种33号[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.1-188.
  • 7肖承协,薛春汀,黄学涔.江西崇义早奥陶世笔石地层[J].地质学报,1975(2):112-125. 被引量:15
  • 8肖承协 夏天亮 等.对江西崇义地区奥陶系的新观察[J].地层学杂志,1982,6(1):64-71.
  • 9肖承协 夏天亮.江西崇义早奥陶世早期含笔石地层[J].地层学杂志,1984,8(3):220-224.
  • 10肖承协,陈洪冶.江西崇义早奥陶世茅坪组的笔石[J].古生物学报,1993,32(3):355-371. 被引量:7

二级参考文献9

  • 1赵祥麟,古生物学报,1988年,27卷,2期,188页
  • 2Chen Xu,J Palaeont,1985年,59卷,3期,495页
  • 3Li Jijin,Palaeont Cathayana,1985年,2卷,103页
  • 4肖承协,地层学杂志,1984年,8卷,3期,220页
  • 5俞剑华,古生物学报,1984年,23卷,5期,532页
  • 6许杰,地质学报,1979年,53卷,1期,1页
  • 7汪啸风,古生物学报,1979年,18卷,5期,493页
  • 8穆恩之,中国科学,1974年,17卷,2期,174页
  • 9穆恩之,中国古生物志.新乙种.5,1955年

共引文献82

同被引文献25

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部