摘要
被朱振国认为“屠鲁事件”的《收获》风波在广大鲁研工作者的反击下平息后 ,陈漱渝最后又对鲁迅研究的热点问题进行了梳理并分别运用不同的逻辑方法对冯骥才和王朔等人作了批评。虽然说其学理批判以无可辩驳的论证令人信服 ,但 2 0世纪末所出现的“贬损”鲁迅思潮也自有必然的众多原因 ,如鲁迅亦有其不足以及众多禁区所产生的逆反心理等。这才使无论是“捍卫”派抑或是“贬损”派都只看到了“金银盾”的一面。
After the disturbance of 'Harvest', which was referred to by Zhu Zhenguo as 'Killing Lu Xun Incident', subsided because of the counter-attack by the researcher of Lu Xun, Chen Suyu sorted out the focus of the issue and criticized Feng Jicai, Wang Su and others using respective logical methods. Although his theoretical criticisms are convincing because of their disputable arguments, the ideological trend of 'disparaging' Lu Xun that occurred in the late 20th century had a host of reasons, e.g., Lu Xun's shortcomings and counter reactions caused too many taboos. This led either the pros or the cons to see only one side of the issue.
出处
《江苏教育学院学报（社会科学版）》
2002年第1期78-80,101,共4页
Journal of Jiangsu Institute of Education(Social Science)
