期刊文献+

脓毒症患者连续性肾脏替代治疗时机选择及预后影响因素分析 被引量:2

Analysis of timing and prognostic factors of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 探讨脓毒症患者连续性肾脏替代治疗的时机选择及其预后影响因素。方法将210例脓毒症患者根据急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ评分分为研究组112例,对照组98例,比较治疗前后两组生化及生理指标变化情况,评估影响患者预后的影响因素。结果治疗后两组各项指标与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究组心率、平均动脉压、白细胞计数、血小板计数、血尿素氮、血肌酐较对照组变化更显著。休克、连续性肾脏替代治疗开始时间、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ评分是影响患者预后的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论连续性肾脏替代治疗可有效改善脓毒症患者的生化及生理指标,休克、连续性肾脏替代治疗开始时间、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ评分是影响脓毒症患者预后的独立危险因素。 Objective To analyze the timing and prognostic factors of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis.Methods 210 patients with sepsis were divided into study group (112 cases) and control group (98 cases)according to acute physiology and APACHE Ⅱ.The changes of biochemical and physiological indexes in the two groups before and after treatment were compared,and the factors influencing the prognosis of the patients were evaluated.Results After treatment,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).Heart rate,mean arterial pressure,white blood cell count,platelet count,blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine in the study group changed more significantly than those in the control group.Shock,onset time of continuous renal replacement therapy,acute physiology and APACHE Ⅱ were independent risk factors for prognosis (P<0.05).Conclusion CRRT can effectively improve the biochemical and physiological indexes of patients with sepsis.Shock, onset time of continuous renal replacement therapy,acute physiology and APACHE Ⅱ are independent risk factors on prognosis in patients with sepsis.
作者 宋金雁 卢艳 周波 Song Jinyan;Lu Yan;Zhou Bo(Jiyuan People's Hospital,Jiyuan 454650,Henan,China)
机构地区 济源市人民医院
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2019年第1期45-47,58,共4页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词 脓毒症 连续性肾脏替代治疗 治疗时机 预后 Sepsis continuous renal replacement therapy timing of treatment prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1崔虎军,信维强,谭艳芬.3种危重症评分系统对心脏大血管外科术后患者预后评估的分析[J].中国危重病急救医学,2004,16(11):673-676. 被引量:7
  • 2SoaresM, SalluhJI. Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2006, 32(11):1839-1844.
  • 3ZeitlingerBS, ZeitlingerM, LeitnerI, et al. Clinical scoring system for the prediction of target site penetration of antimicrobials in patients with sepsis[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2007, 46(1):75-83.
  • 4LevyMM, FinkMP, MarshallJC, et al. 2001 SCCM / ESICM / ACCP / ATS / SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference[J].Intensive Care Med, 2003, 29(4):530-538.
  • 5KimHB, AhnHS, KwonJS, et al. Validation of POSSUM-physiological score as predictors of post-operative morbidity and mortality after emergency operation for peptic ulcer complications[J]. J Korean Surg Soc, 2009, 77:391-398.
  • 6ChoiWH, HwangSY, JunSY, et al. Usefulness of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in patients with sepsis due to intra-abdominal infection[J]. J Korean Surg Soc2009, 76:273-278.
  • 7ChenYC, LinMC, LinYC, et al. ICU discharge APACHEⅡ scores help to predict post-ICU death[J]. Chang Gung Med J, 2007, 30(2):142-150.
  • 8KhwannimitB. Serial evaluation of the MODS, SOFA and LOD scores to predict ICU mortality in mixed critically ill patients[J].J Med Assoc Thai, 2008, 91(9):1336-1342.
  • 9StevensV, LodiseTP, TsujiB, et al. The utility of acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ scores for prediction of mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2012, 33(6):558-564.
  • 10NavedSA, SiddiquiS, KhanFH. APACHEⅡ score correlation with mortality and length of stay in an intensive care unit[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2011, 21(1):4-8.

共引文献183

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部