期刊文献+

他克莫司和环孢素A对肾移植术后患者肝功能影响的临床比较观察 被引量:13

Effect of FK506 and CsA on hepatic function of renal transplant recipients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究和比较他克莫司 (FK5 0 6 )以及环孢素A(CsA)对肾移植术后患者肝功能的影响。方法 将肾移植术后患者随机分为FK5 0 6组和CsA组 ,FK5 0 6组 8例 ,CsA组 2 6例。CsA组中出现肝功能异常的 6例患者用FK5 0 6进行替换治疗。两组均联合应用霉酚酸酯 (MMF)和泼尼松(Pred)。结果 观察 6个月 ,FK5 0 6组和CsA组中急性排斥的发生率差异不显著 ;FK5 0 6组中未发现肝功能异常患者 ,CsA组中有 6例患者肝功能异常 ;肝功能异常的 6例患者用FK5 0 6替换CsA后 ,总胆红素 (TBIL)、直接胆红素 (DBIL)、丙氨酸转氨酶 (ALT)相继转为正常。结论 FK5 0 6免疫抑制效果与CsA相似 ,但对肝功能影响甚微 。 ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of FK506 and CsA comparatively on hepatic function of renal transplant recipients. Methods FK506 and CsA were used respectively as a post operative immunosuppressant for 8 and 26 cases of renal transplantation. In the CsA treated group, 6 cases of hepatic dysfunction were conversed to FK506. Both two groups took MMF and prednisone. Results During the period of observation, there was no significant difference between FK506 and CsA in acute rejection incidence. Comparing to FK506 group with no case of hepatic dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction occurred in 6 cases who conversed to FK506, and liver function returned normal gradually in the CsA group. Conclusion It is effective and safe to substitute CsA by FK506 combined with MMF in renal transplant recipients with hepatic dysfunction after renal transplantation.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2001年第6期364-365,共2页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
关键词 免疫抑制剂 肾移植 肝功能 他克莫司 环孢素A Immunosuppressive agents Kidney transplantation Liver function
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献1

  • 1Stefan Schleibner,Manuela Krauss,Karl Wagner,Jochen Erhard,Maarten Christiaans,Johannes Hooff,Laura Buist,David Mayer. FK 506 versus cyclosporin in the prevention of renal allograft rejection — European pilot study: six-week results[J] 1995,Transplant International(2):86~90

共引文献20

同被引文献65

  • 1于立新,王志鹏,付绍杰,王亦斌,杜传福,徐健,邓文锋.丙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植术后影响的临床研究[J].第一军医大学学报,2004,24(6):682-684. 被引量:4
  • 2孙启全,王金泉.乙型肝炎病毒感染对肾移植患者预后的影响[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2004,13(3):283-287. 被引量:8
  • 3黄丽萍,石根玉,周华,王振兴,武小桐.他克莫司应用于初次肾移植三年临床观察[J].山西医药杂志,2007,36(6):501-503. 被引量:1
  • 4Kramer BK,Montagnino G,Del Castillo D,et al.European Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporin Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study Group:efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation:2 year follow-up results.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2005;20(5):968-973.
  • 5Vincenti F,Jensik SC,Filo RS,et al.A long-term comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in kidney transplantation:Evidence for improved allograft survival at five years.Transplantation.2002; 73:775-782.
  • 6Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, et al. Banff'05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN'). Am J Transplant, 2007,7 (3) : 518-526.
  • 7Wang T, Donahoe PK, Zervos AS. Specific interaction of type I receptors of the TGF-beta family with the immunophilin FKBP-12. Science, 1994,265 (5172) : 674-676.
  • 8Chae HJ, Ha MS, Yun DH, et al. Mechanism of cyclosporine- induced overgrowth in gingiva. J Dent Res, 2006,85 (6) : 515- 519.
  • 9Yu X, Zhang B, Xing C, et al. Different effect of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on renal expression of P-glycoprotein in human kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc, 2008,40 (10) : 3455- 3459.
  • 10Videla CO. Two-year experience with tacrolimus in renal transplantation after late conversion from cyclosporine therapy. Transplant Proc, 2009,41(6): 2659-2663.

引证文献13

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部