摘要
目的 比较剖宫产围手术期应用抗生素与传统序贯方法使用抗生素两种方法预防产褥感染的效果。方法 随机将 2 0 0例腹膜内剖宫产产妇分成两组 ,各 10 0例 ,即围手术期用药组 (A组 )和术后序贯用药组 (B组 ) ,两组均使用同一种抗生素头孢曲松钠。结果 A组术后体温及退热时间分别低于或短于B组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,A组术后病率明显低于B组 (P<0 .0 1) ,A组人均抗生素使用量少于B组 (P <0 .0 1)。结论 围手术期用药预防产褥感染效果好 ,且有利于产妇术后体力恢复 。
Objective To compare the effect of antibioctic during perioperation in cesarean section with that in the routine method.Method 200 cases of ceserean section were randomly divided into two groups:group A(patients who received antibiotic during perioperation) and group B(patients who received antibiotic as routine method).All of them received same kind of antibiotic(ceftriaxone sodium).Results The temperature and the duration of fever dropping in Group A were significantly lower and shorter than those of group B( P <0.05).The puerperal morbidity in group A were significantly lower than that of group B.The average amount of antioctic which patients received in group A was significantly less than that of group B.Conclusion The effect of perioperative antibioctic prophylaxis is good,and it is in favor of puerpera to recovery,and may also reduce the consume of medicine.
出处
《现代诊断与治疗》
CAS
2001年第5期270-271,共2页
Modern Diagnosis and Treatment
