期刊文献+

不变方差弹性(CEV)过程下障碍期权的定价 被引量:19

Pricing barrier options under CEV process
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 论证了当基础资产遵循不变方差弹性 (constantelasticity of variance,CEV)过程时障碍期权的定价问题 ,构建了一个三项式模型来对 CEV过程进行近似化并利用其为障碍期权定价 .就标准期权而言 ,CEV与 Black- Scholes模型之间的相关量相对较小 .结论是 ,拥有一个准确的模型描述对依赖极限期权比标准期权要重要得多 . This paper examines the pricing of barrier options when the underlying asset follows the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) process. We construct a trinomial method to approximate the CEV process and use it to price barrier options, and demonstrate the accuracy of our approach for different parameter values of the CEV process. We find that the prices of barrier options for the CEV process deviate significantly from those for lognormal process. For standard options, the corresponding differences between the CEV and Black Scholes models are relatively small. The result model specification for options depends an extrema than for standard option.
作者 谢赤
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 2001年第5期13-20,共8页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 ( 79970 0 15 ) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目 ( 99JJY2 0 0 6 5 ) .
关键词 CEV过程 障碍期权 期权定价 三项式模型 标准期权 the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) process barrier options pricing options trinomial method standard options
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[1]Merton R C. The theory of rational option pricing[J]. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1973,(4):141-183
  • 2[2]Black F, Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, (81):637-659
  • 3[3]Cheuk T H F, Vorst T C F. The constant elasticity of variance option pricing model[J]. Journal of Portfolio Mana-gement, 1996, (22):15-17
  • 4[4]Cox J C. Notes on option pricing I: constant elasticity of variance diffusions[M]. Unpubl. Note Stanford Univ., 1975
  • 5[5]Cox J C, Ross S A. The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes[J]. Journal of Financial Econimics, 1976, (3): 145-166
  • 6[6]Duffic D. Dynamic asset pricing theory[M]. Princetion, NJ:Princeton Unive. Press, 1996
  • 7[7]Boyle P P. Option valuation using a three-jump process[J]. International Options Journal, 1986, (3):7-12
  • 8[8]Boyle P P. A lattice framework for option pricing with two state variables[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1988,(35):1-12
  • 9[9]Kamrad B, Ritchken P. Multionmial approximating models for options with K-state variables[J]. Management Science, 1991, (37): 1640-1652
  • 10[10]Tian Y. A modified lattice approach to option pricing[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 1993, (13): 563-577

同被引文献161

引证文献19

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部