摘要
《三国演义》黄正甫本在明刊《三国演义》中本不足道,但近年被哄传为“现存最早绘图古本”,并进而否定此书为罗贯中所作,故需一辩。被认为足以证明此本为现存“最早”刊本的几个内容上的特点,实都已见于嘉靖二十七年的叶逢春刊本,且有内证可以证明黄本实出于叶本一系的本子之后:一、叶本十卷。黄本二十卷,实系将十卷分拆而成,第七、八回尚留有分拆之迹。二、黄本已经是经过删削的简本,其前必有供其删削的繁本,而叶本正是此类繁本。三、叶本尚无后加的关索故事,而黄本已有。四、叶本有嘉靖二十七年序,黄本的序为“癸亥春三月”(孙楷第先生定为天启癸亥,是)作。是黄本必出于叶本之后。有人以黄本的字体为“手写体”,与其正文字体不一致为由而谓序系后加,则殊可笑。
Although Huang Zhengfu's edition of Sanguo Yanyi appears insignificant when compared with the other e-ditions of Sanguo Yanyi which came out in the Ming Dynasty, yet in recent years? it has been widely circulated and considered to be the earliest ancient edition with pictures among the extant ones; furthermore it has been denied that Luo Guanzhong was the author of the classic. This article is intended to clarify the above-mentioned, which is believed to be worthwhile.
出处
《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2001年第5期47-55,共9页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
