摘要
目的 比较关节松动、肌肉牵拉和物理因子综合治疗与单纯物理因子治疗肩关节周围炎的临床效果、方法１１２例肩关节周围炎患者，随机分为手法关节松动、肌肉牵拉和物理因子综合治疗组３８例；对照组７４例只采用物理因子治疗。两组治疗后均辅以肩周炎医疗体操及肌力训练．巩固治疗。结果治疗组临床治愈１４例，显效１８例，好转５例，无效１例；对照组临床治愈３例，显效２９例，好转３３例，无效９例。两组临床治愈显效率比较，差异具有非常显著性的意义（ｕｃ＝４．９６，Ｐ＜０．０１）。结论 采用关节松动、肌肉牵拉和物理因子综合治疗肩关节周围炎，比单纯采用物理因子治疗效果更加明确。
Objective To compare clinical effect of joint mobilization, muscular traction and physical factor therapy with single physical factor therapy for scapulohumeral periarthritis. Methods 38 cases with scapulohumeral periarthritis used joint mobilization, muscular traction, and physical factor therapy, other 74 cases used single physical factor therapy. Results Treatment group, cured 14 cases, excellence l8 cases, effect 5 cases, no effect l case. The control group, cured 3 cases, excellence 29 cases, effect 33 cas, no effect 9 cases. The cured and excellent rates of the two groups showed a significant difference (P < 0. 01 ). Conclusion Comprehensive therapy of joint mobilization, muscular traction and physical factor for scapulohumeral periarthritis are more effective than single physical factor therapy.
出处
《中华物理医学与康复杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2001年第5期282-283,共2页
Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
