摘要
《明成化说唱词话丛书》没有对校勘的依据作出说明。特别在《断歪乌盆传》中 ,把原文“毫州”校为“亳州”,可能是不当的 ,“毫”当作“濠”
Collators didn't give explanation to the notes of Versed Novels of Ming Dynasty. In one of those novels, they changed "亳州" into "濠州". The correct character should be "濠", the same Chinese pronunciation to "毫".
出处
《上海大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2001年第3期37-38,共2页
Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
