摘要
日本宪法中明确规定绝对放弃战争、不保持一切武力。尽管如此 ,日本依然军备。日美安全保障条约签署后 ,日美间的军事协作关系更加明显。在日本国内 ,展开了关于自卫队的存在是否符合宪法的激烈争论。日本的司法、审判机关在审判具体案件时 ,回避对自卫队的存在是否符合宪法这一问题做出判断。随着国际形势的变化 ,日本在“国际贡献”的名目下 ,制定出PKO法 ,并公然向海外派兵 ,这更是宪法所不容许的。日本是世界经济大国 ,应该放弃武力 。
Japans Consitution explicitly provides for the absolute renunciation of war and of the maintenance of any armed strength.Nevertheless,Japan still has its armament.The military coordination between Japan and US has become increasingly apparent after the conclusion of US Japan Security Treaty.In Japan,there have been heated disputes on the issue whether the existence of self defense troops is in compliance with the Constitution.The judicial authorities of Japan avoid judgement on the compliance of the existence of self defense troops with the Constitution in their trial of specific cases.With the changes in the international situation,Japan promulgated the Law of PKO and openly sent armed forces abroad under the name of“international contribution”,which is even more prohibited by the Constitution.As an economic giant in the world,Japan should renounce armed strength and make contributions to the international development and peace by means of ODA.
出处
《韶关学院学报》
2001年第4期23-28,共6页
Journal of Shaoguan University
