期刊文献+

风速频谱对人体热舒适性的影响 被引量:24

Impact of wind spectra on human thermal comfort
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究了自然风与机械风频谱的区别及对热舒适的影响。研究发现自然风的频谱在低频区较机械风丰富。提出了一种模拟自然风频谱的方法 ,并利用此方法研究了频谱形状及吹风频率上下限对人体热舒适性的影响。主观问卷实验表明 :接近于自然风频谱的吹风模式比其它吹风模式有更好的可接受性。同时发现人体对吹风频率感受的上限在1Hz附近 ,而频率下限在 0 .2 44~ 0 .488m Comparison of the power spectra of natural wind and artificial air movement showed that the natural wind spectra has many more low frequency variations than artificial airflow. Thorefore a new method was developed for generating air movements with the same velocity spectra as natural wind. Air flows generated with the new method were used to assess the impact of the spectra shape and the upper and lower frequency limits on human thermal comfort. The subjective experiments indicate that the upper frequency limit for thermal confort is about 1Hz and the lower frequency limit is about 0.244~0.488mHz and that air movement with spectra similar to that of natural wind is more suitable for thermal comfort than other air movement modes.
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2001年第6期89-91,共3页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (5 983 62 5 0 )
关键词 频谱 自然风 热舒适 空调 风速 人体 spectrum natural wind thermal comfort
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]Rohles F. The effects of air movement and temperature on the thermal sensation of sedentary man [J]. ASHARE Trans, 1974, 80(1): 101119.
  • 2[2]McIntyre D A. Preferred air speeds for comfort in warm conditions [J]. ASHARE Trans, 1978, 84(2): 264277.
  • 3[3]Jones B W, Hsleh K, Hashinaga M. The effect of air velocity on thermal comfort at moderate activity levels [J]. ASHRAE Tranc, 1986, 92(2B): 761768.
  • 4[4]Fountain M, Bauman F, Aren E. Locally controlled air movement preferred in warn isothermal environments [J]. ASHRAE Trans, 1994, 100(2): 937952.
  • 5[5]Fanger P. The effect on man's comfort of a uniform air flow from different directions [J]. ASHRAE Trans, 1988, 12: 2139.

同被引文献248

引证文献24

二级引证文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部