期刊文献+

胸水细胞端粒酶活性检测对良恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值 被引量:4

Differential diagnostic value of telomerase activity in malignant and benign pleural effusions
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨胸水细胞端粒酶活性对良、恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值。方法 用改良的PCR ELISA法检测 37例恶性、32例良性胸水细胞端粒酶活性 ,并与胸水细胞学、癌胚抗原 (CEA)诊断结果进行比较。结果  37例恶性胸腔积液中有 2 6例端粒酶活性阳性 (2 6 / 37) ,阳性率为 70 2 7% ,高于良性胸腔积液中端粒酶活性表达 (2 / 32 ,P <0 0 1) ;端粒酶活性检测诊断恶性胸水敏感性为 70 2 7% ,特异性为93 75 % ,与胸水细胞学诊断符合率为 5 4 0 5 % ;其敏感性高于胸水CEA诊断结果 (敏感性为 5 1 35 % )。结论 胸水细胞端粒酶活性检测作为细胞学检查的辅助手段能提高恶性胸水的诊断率 ,有助于良、恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断。 Objective To study the diagnostic value of pleural fluid telomerase activity in distinguishing a malignant from a benign pleural effusion. Methods Using a PCR-based assay, telomerase activity was examined in the pleural fluid cells obstained from 69 patients with pleural effusions (37 malignant, 32 benign). Results were compared with cytologic evaluation and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Results Of the 37 malignant specimens,26(70.27%)contained detectable telomerase activity. The positive rate in malignant pleural effusions was significantly higher than that in benign origin (2/32). Detection of telomerase in effusions was more sensitive than CEA level evaluation for the identification of pleural malignancy (telomerase assay: sensitivity=70.27%, specificity=93.75%; CEA: sensitivity=51.35%, specificity=96.87%). The consistant rate of telomerase with cytology was 54.05%. Conclusion The detection of telomerase activity may be a useful adjunct to cytopathologic methods in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions. It may be useful in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural effusions.
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 2001年第1期49-51,共3页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
关键词 端粒 酶学 胸腔积液 诊断 鉴别诊断 telomere/enzymology pleural effusion/diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献15

同被引文献51

  • 1邢国宏 张劭夫 姜晓宇 等.检测血小板表面与血浆颗粒膜蛋白-140对鉴别结核性恶性胸腔积液的意义[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2000,23(4):234-234.
  • 2Christ-Crain M, Muller B. Procalcitonin in bacterial infections-hype, hope, more or less [ J ]. Swiss Med Wkly, 2005,135 ( 31- 32) :451 -60.
  • 3Luyt C E, Guerin V, Comb A, et al. Procalcitonin kinetics as a prognostic marker of ventilator-associated pneumonia [ J ]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2005,171 ( 1 ) :48 -53.
  • 4Chastre J,Luyt C E, Trouillet J L, et al. New diagnostic and prognostic markers of ventilator-associated pneumonia [ J ]. Curt Opin Crit care,2006,12 ( 5 ) :446 - 51.
  • 5Christ-Crain M, Mtiller B. Procalcitonin and pneumonia: Is it a useful marker? [ J ]. Curt Infect Dis Rep,2007,9 (3) :233 - 40.
  • 6Casado-Flores J, Blanco-Quiros A, Nieto M, et al. Prognostic utility of the semi-quantitative procalcitonin test, neutrophil count and C-reactive protein in meningococcal infection in children [ J ]. Eur J Pediatr,2006,165 ( 1 ) :26 - 9.
  • 7Viallon A,Zeni F,Pouzet V,et al. Serum and ascitic procalcitonin levels in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: diagnostic value and relationship to pro-inflammatory cytokines [ J ]. Intensive Care Med,2000,26 ( 8 ) : 1082 - 8.
  • 8Kim S H, Kim S T, Kim C W, et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in differentiation of pleural effusion [ J ]. Chest,2007,132(4) :462.
  • 9Cakir E, Deniz O, Ozcan O, et al. Pleural fluid and serum procalcitoni n as diagnostic tools in tuberculous pleurisy[ J ]. Clin Biochem, 2005,38(3) :234 -8.
  • 10Whang K T,Vath S D,Becker K L,et al. Procalcitonin and proin-flammatory cytokine interactions in sepsis [ J ]. Shock, 2000, 14 (1):73-8.

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部