期刊文献+

结肠腺瘤摘除后结肠镜随访间期的探讨 被引量:3

Evaluation of Colonoscopic Surveillance interval after Removal of Colonic Adenomas
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:提出易导致腺瘤复发或癌变的高危特征和因素,延长非高危人群的结肠镜随访间期,从而降低医疗费用。方法:行结肠镜下腺瘤摘除术患者504例,随访间期6~48个月,分析年龄、性别、腺瘤数量、最大直径和病理类型等因素与腺瘤复发的关系。结肠镜复查时发现以下病变者归人高危人群:绒毛管状腺瘤、绒毛状腺瘤、重度不典型增生/原位癌、浸润性癌或腺瘤直径≥  1cm及复发腺瘤数≥ 4枚。结果:经相关分析,腺瘤复发与原腺瘤数量和大小的增加呈正相关(P<0.001),与年龄、性别、原腺瘤病理类型及结肠镜随访间期等因素无关。结论:可延长低危人群(首次结肠镜检查仅发现1或2枚腺瘤且直径均<1cm者)的结肠镜随访间期,从而大大降低结肠癌监控的费用。 Background/Aims: The cost of colonoscopic surveillance is directly related to the frequency of examinations, and follow-up study should ideally be reserved for patients with a clearly increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Methods: 504 patients who had their colonic adenomas removed at colonoscopy and taken a surveillance examination within 6 to 48 months, were evaluated. Potential risk factors studied were age, gender, number, size and pathologic pattern. The characteristics of the following lesions were considered high risks for cancer development with poor prognosis: tubulovillous or villous adenoma, high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ, invasive cancer, size ≥ 1 cm, and 4 or more adenomas. Results: Regression analysis showed only increased number and size of adenoma was positively correlated with its recurrence (P<0.001), while age, gender, pathologic pattern of the adenoma and the time interval between eolonoscopies were not relevant. Conclusions: Patients with 1 or 2 adenomas less than 1 cm in diameter on first colonoscopic examination are considered as low-risk group and the surveillance interval can be prolonged so as to lower the expenses used in colonoscopy.
出处 《胃肠病学》 2001年第1期35-37,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology
关键词 结肠肿瘤 腺癌 结肠镜检查 随访研究 Colonic Neoplasms Adenoma Colonoscopy Follow-Up Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, Godlee F,Stolar MH, Mulrow CD, Woolf SH, Glick SN,Ganiats TG, Bond JH, Rosen L, Zapka JG, OlsenSJ, Giardiello FM, Sisk JE, Van Antwerp R,Brown-Davis C, Marciniak DA, Mayer RJ. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines andrationale. Gastroenterology, 1997, 112: 594~642.
  • 2Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, BeckGJ. Adenoma size and number are predictive ofadenoma recurrence: implications for surveillancecolonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2000, 51 (4 Pt 1):433 ~437.
  • 3全春子,刘金陵,赵环宇,陈彤.239例直结肠息肉的随访观察[J].中华消化内镜杂志,1999,16(3):174-175. 被引量:13
  • 4胡炳钿,张建中,杨建毓.消化道息肉的内镜治疗及随访[J].中华消化内镜杂志,1999,16(3):176-177. 被引量:33
  • 5Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable tothe endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc, 1997,46: 492~496.
  • 6van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, Haile R, Summers R. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence andcharacteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology, 1998, 115:13~18.
  • 7Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, Bond JH, Wayne JD,Schaqiro M, Stewart ET. Can surveillance intervals be lengthened following colonoscopic polypectomy? Gastroenterology, 1998, 112: A50.
  • 8van Stolk RU, Beach M, Baron JA, GreenbergER. For the Polyp Prevention Group. Incidence ofcolorectal cancer during colonoscopic surveillance in a four year polyp prevention trial. Gastroenterology, 1998, 114: A697.
  • 9Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY,Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG.Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determinedby back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology,1997, 112: 24~28.
  • 10Otchy DP, Ransohoff DF, Wolff BG, Weaver A,Ilstrup D, Carlson H, Rademacher D. Metachronous colon cancer in persons who have had a largeadenomatous polyp. Am J Gastroenterol, 1996, 91:448~454.

共引文献42

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部