期刊文献+

硼替佐米治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和安全性分析 被引量:12

Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 收集接受硼替佐米+地塞米松+沙利度胺(BDT)方案化疗的25例多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的临床信息,对其疗效、相关影响因素及不良反应进行回顾性分析及评价。以硼替佐米为基础的化疗方案治疗25例MM患者的总有效(OR)率为80.00%(20/25),其中完全缓解(CR)9例(36.00%),非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)6例(24.00%),部分缓解(PR)5例(20.00%);复发/难治性MM患者与新诊断MM患者的疗效相当(OR率:62.5%vs 88.24%,P>0.05);国际分期系统(ISS)Ⅰ+Ⅱ期患者疗效与Ⅲ期患者疗效差异无统计学意义(OR率:83.33%vs 76.92%;P>0.05);长疗程(≥4个疗程)化疗组患者的CR率明显高于短疗程(3、2、1个疗程)化疗组患者(77.78%vs 30.77%vs15.79%vs 4.00%);浆细胞白血病及严重肾功能损害的MM瘤可获得VGPR以上疗效;主要不良反应包括周围神经病变、胃肠道反应、血小板减少、粒细胞缺乏、皮疹等,经过对症治疗以及调整剂量后均能改善。 The clinical features of all 25 multiple myeloma ( MM ) patients who were treated with BDT regimen ( bortezomib and dexamethasone and thalidomide) were recruited. The efficacy and related influence factors and adverse drug reactions were retrospectively evaluated. The overall remission(OR) rate was 80. 00%(20/25) and the complete remission (CR) rate was 36. 00% (9/25),very good partial remission (VGPR) and partial remission (PR) rate were 24. 00% (6/25) and 20. 00%(5/25) respectively in MM patients with BDT regimen. The OR rate of relapsing/refractory MM patients was not statistically lower than that of newly-diagnosed MM patients (62. 5% vs 88. 24%,P〉0. 05). The OR rate of ISSⅢstage patients was as better as that of ISS I andⅡstage patients(83. 33% vs 76. 92%, P〉0. 05). The CR rate of the arm who received many cycle regimens(≥4 cycles) was higher than that of the arm who received 4 cycles regimens(3,2,1 cycles),but there was no statistically significant difference. The patients with plasma cell leukemia and renal failure were treated with bortezomib based regimen and achieved PR or above. The main adverse effects were peripheral neuropathy,gastrointestinal symptoms, thrombocytopenia,neutropenia,skin rash,et al. All adverse events were diminished by using routine ways.
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第7期1018-1021,共4页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 安徽省教育厅自然科学基金(编号:KJ2009A78)
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 硼替佐米 疗效 不良反应 multiple myeloma bortezomib treatment outcome adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Reece D. Update on the initial therapy of multiple myeloma [ J ]. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 2013,33 :e307 -12.
  • 2Steven H S, Elisa C, Nancy L H, et al. WHO classification of tu- mum of haemotopoietic and lymphomoid tissues [ M ]. 4th edition. Lyon:International agency for research on cancer,2008:200 -9.
  • 3Dufie B G, Harousseau J L, Mignel J S, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma [ J ]. Leukemia, 2006,20 (9) :1467 -73.
  • 4National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events [ S ]. v4.0. U. S Departt- ment of Health and Human Services ,2009:3 -56.
  • 5万军.VD方案和VAD方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2013,21(3):647-649. 被引量:15
  • 6赵瑜,窦立萍,王书红,薄剑,王全顺,黄文荣,靖域,高春记,李红华,朱海燕,韩晓萍,于力.PAD与VAD两种方案对初治多发性骨髓瘤疗效和安全性比较[J].中华内科杂志,2010,49(9):762-764. 被引量:19
  • 7Jagannath S, Durie B G, Wolf J L, et al. Extended follow-up of a phase 2 trial of bortezomib alone and in combination with dexam- ethasone for the frontline treatment of multiple myeloma[ J]. Br J Haemato1,2009,46 (6) :619 - 26.
  • 8Pantani L, Zamagni E, Zannetti B A, et al. Bortezomib and dexa- methasone as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of long-term clinical outcomes [ J ]. Ann Hematol,2013,93 ( 1 ) : 123 - 8.
  • 9Lee H S, Kim Y S, Kim K, et al. Early response to bortezomib combined chemotherapy can help predict survival in patients with multiple myeloma who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation [ J ]. J Korean ned Sci,2013,28 ( 1 ) : 80 - 6.
  • 10Haynes R, Leung N, Kyle R, et al. Myeloma kidney: improving clinical outcomes?[J]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis,2012,19 (5) : 342 - 51.

二级参考文献36

  • 1Dingli D,Nowakowski GS,Dispenzieri A,et al.Flow cytometric detection of circulating myeloma cells before stratification system in patients with multiple myeloma:a simple risk stratification system.Blood,2006,107:3384-3388.
  • 2van de Velde H J,Liu X,Chen G,et al.Complete response correlates with long-term survival and progression-free survival in high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma.Haematologica,2007,92:1399-1406.
  • 3Mehta J,Singhal S.High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma patients under the age of 65 years.Bone Marrow Transplant,2007,40:1101-1114.
  • 4Chaman-Khan A,Miller KC.Velcade,doxil and thalidomide (VDT) is an effective salvage regimen for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.Leuk Lymphoma,2005,46:1103-1104.
  • 5Ciolli S,Leoni F,Giqli F,et al.Low dose velcade,thalidomide and dexamethasone (LD-VTD):an effective regimen for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients.Leuk Lymphoma,2006,47:171-173.
  • 6Richardson PG,Xie W,Mitsiades C,et al.Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma:efficacy,characterization of peripheral neuropathy,and molecular correlations with response and neuropathy.J Clin Oncol,2009,27:3518-3525.
  • 7Berenson JR.Hematology:bortezomib in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Nat Rev Clin Oncol,2009,6:255-256.
  • 8]Palumbo A,Rajkumar SV.Treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma.Leukemia,2009,23:449-456.
  • 9O'Connor OA,Moskowitz C,Portlock C,et al.Patients with chemotherapy-refractory mantle cell lymphoma experience high response rates and identical progression-free survivals compared with patients with relapsed disease following treatment with single agent bortezomib:results of a multicentre phase 2 clinical trial.Br J Haematol,2009,145:34-39.
  • 10Kyle RA,Rajkumar SV.Criteria for diagnosis,staging,risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma.Leukemia,2009,23:3-9.

共引文献43

同被引文献78

  • 1CHANAN-KHAN A A, GIRALT S. Importance of achieving a complete response in multiple myeloma, and the impact of novel agents[ J] .J Clin 0ncol,2010,28(15) :2616-2624.
  • 2MOREAU P, SAN M J, LUDWIG H, et al. Multiple myelo- aaa: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treat- ment and follow-up [ J ].Ann Oncol, 2013,24 (6) : 133-137.
  • 3AJKUMAR S V.Multiple myeloma:2011 update on diag- nosis, risk-stratification, and management [ J ]. Am J Hema- tol,2011,86(1) :57-65.
  • 4CAVO M,TACCHETrI P, PATRIARCA F, et al.Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalido- mide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before, and consolidation therapy after double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma:a ran- domized phase 3 study [ J ]. Lancet, 2010, 376 ( 9758 ) : 2O75-2085.
  • 5GARDERET L, IACOBELLI S, MOREAU P, et al.Superiori- ty of the triple combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexa- methasone over the dual combination of thalidomide-dexam- ethasone in patients with multiple myeloma progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation:the MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 randomized phase m trial from the Chronic Leuke- mia Working Party of the European Group for blood and marrow transplantation [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30 (20) : 2475-2482.
  • 6LUDWIG H, VITERBO L, GREIL R, et al. Randomized phase lI study of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexametha- sone with or without cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma[ J ] .J Clin Oncol, 2013.31(2) :247-255.
  • 7MOREAU P, AVET-LOISEAU H, FACON T, et al. Borte- zomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment be- fore autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [ J ]. Blood, 2011,118 ( 22 ) : 5752- 5758, 5982.
  • 8ROSIONAL L, ORIOL A, TERUEL A I, et al.Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretransplantation therapy in multiple myeloma: a random- ized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study [ J ]. Blood, 2012, 120 (8) :1589-1596.
  • 9HIDESHIMA T, MITSIADES C, KIYAMA M, et al.Moleeu- lar mechanisms mediating antimyeloma activity of protea- some inhabitor PS-341 [ J ]. Blood, 2003, 101 (4) : 1530 - 1534.
  • 10KAUFMAN J L, NOOKA A, VRANA M, et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for pa- tients with symptomatic multiple myeloma: a retrospective study[J] .Cancer,2010,116(13) :3143-3151.

引证文献12

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部