摘要
运用文献资料、比较分析法、专家访谈和录像统计等方法,对2012年伦敦奥运会前后拳击竞赛评分规则修订及其对我国男子拳击选手技战术特征的影响进行分析。结果表明:新评分规则鼓励对抗和进攻,并使得竞赛结果更为公平和准确;新评分规则(10分制)评判胜负与原规则相比,对运动员在比赛中技战术运用要求有较大差异,新规则更重视三回合的进攻和对抗,要求组合拳使用的次数和频率明显增多,促使比赛更加激烈精彩;2013年亚洲男子拳击锦标赛中我国男子拳击队的失利以及在比赛中所表现出的打法单一,组合对抗能力较弱,基本技术粗糙等技战术方面的欠缺,充分说明我国男子拳击项目技战术特征对新规则的不适应,迫切需要探索我国男子拳击项目新的训练模式和训练方法。
By using methods of literature review, comparative analysis, expert interview and video statistics, this paper analyzed the revision of boxing grading rules before and after London 2012 Olympics and its influence on technical and tactical characteristics of China male boxers. Results showed that the new grading rules encourage confrontation and attack which make the results more equitable and more accurate. Compared with former rules, the new rules have many differences in the technical and tactic requirements and attach more importance to attack and confrontation in three rounds which require boxers to use more combination punches and make competition more interesting and competitive. In the 2013 Asian Man Boxing Championships, China men＇s national boxing team met a failure due to its simple tactics,weak combining confrontation and immature basic techniques. These phenomenon showed that the technical and tactical characteristics of China men＇s boxing team haven＇t adapted to the new rules and we need to find new training modes and methods urgently.
出处
《北京体育大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期125-128,139,共5页
Journal of Beijing Sport University
基金
教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目
国家体育总局2016巴西奥运会科技攻关项目(2013A001)
关键词
国际拳联
评分规则
男子拳击
技战术
AIBA
grading rule
men＇s boxing
techniques and tactics
