期刊文献+

大螺距模式下智能最佳管电压调节结合迭代重建技术在CT胸主动脉成像中的图像质量和辐射剂量评价 被引量:9

High pitch,automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and iterative reconstruction technique for CT angiography of the thoracic aorta:image quality and radiation dose
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价Flash大螺距模式下智能最佳管电压调节结合原始数据迭代重建技术在CT胸主动脉成像中的图像质量和辐射剂量。方法:按扫描方式将患者分成A,B两组。A组扫描参数采用大螺距模式,智能最佳kVp技术扫描,图像重建方式为迭代重建;B组扫描参数采用常规螺距,120kVp管电压,图像重建方式为滤波反投影法,比较两组客观图像质量及辐射剂量。结果:两组患者年龄、性别均无明显差别。客观图像质量A组明显好于B组。胸主动脉3个位置CT值无统计学差异,但A组的SNR、CNR均明显高于B组,背景噪声A组低于B组。两组主观图像质量评分均无统计学差异。两位医生的一致性分别为0.737、0.617和0.705。A组有效剂量要明显低于B组,降低了30%。结论:大螺距智能最佳管电压调节结合原始数据迭代重建技术CT胸主动脉成像不但有效的降低了辐射剂量,还同时提高了图像质量。 Objective:To investigate the image quality and the radiation dose of high pitch,automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and iterative reconstruction technique for CT angiography of the thoracic aorta.Methods:The patients were divided into two groups according to the scan parameters.Groups A:high pitch (pitch= 3.0),automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and image reconstruction methods with SAFIRE (sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction).Group B:conventional pitch (pitch= 1.2),120kV tube voltage,image reconstruction methods using the FBP (Filtered Back Projection).Objective and subjective image quality and radiation dose were evaluated and compared.Results:There was no significant difference between two groups in the age and gender distribution.The objective image quality of group A was better than that of group B.The CT values of three positions of thoracic aorta had no significant difference. The SNR,CNR of group A were significantly higher than these of group B and the background noise of group A lower than that of group B.Two groups of subjective image quality scores had no significant difference.The Kappa values of two doctors were 0.737,0.617,0.705,respectively.The radiation dose of group A was lower than that of group B,which decreased by approximately 30%.Conclusion:High pitch,automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and iterative reconstruction technique for CT angiography of the thoracic aorta not only effectively reduces the radiation dose,but also maintains the diagnostic image quality.
出处 《放射学实践》 2014年第6期597-600,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 诊断技术 心血管 主动脉 体层摄影术 X线计算机 图像处理 计算机辅助 Diagnostic techniques,cardiovascular Aorta,thoracic Tomography,X-ray computed Image process-ing,computer-assisted
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Duan X,McCollough C. Risks, benefits, and risk reduction strate- gies in thoracic CT imaging[J]. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2014,35(1):83-90.
  • 2Shin HJ, Chung YE, Lee YH, et al. Radiation dose reduction via sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage modulation (CARE kV) in abdominal CT[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2013,14(6) : 886-893.
  • 3Wang Z, Chen Y, Wang Y, et al. Feasibility of low-dose contrast medium high pitch CT angiography for the combined evaluation of coronary,head and neck arteries[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (3): e90268.
  • 4Apfaltrer PI, Hanna EL,Schoepf UJ, et al. Radiation dose and im- age quality at high-pitch CT angiography of the aorta..intraindivid- ual and interindividual comparisons with conventional CT angiog- raphy[J]. AJR, 2012,199(6) : 1402-1409.
  • 5Winklehner A,Goetti R, Baumueller S, et al. Automated attenua- tion-based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography improved dose effectivenesss[J]. Invest Radiol,2011,46(12) :767-773.
  • 6Beeres M, Schell B, Mastragelopoulos A, et al. High-pitch dual- source CT angiography of the whole aorta without ECG synchro- nisation : initial experience[J]. Eur Radiol, 2012,22(1) : 129-137.
  • 7Niemann T, Henry S, Faivre JB, et al. Clinical evaluation of auto- matic tube voltage selection in chest CT angiography[J]. Eur Ra diol, 2013,23 (10) :2643-265 1.
  • 8Wang H, Tan B, Zhao B, et al. Raw-data-based iterative recon- struction versus filtered back projection:image quality of low-dose chest computed tomography examinations in 87 patients[J]. Clin Imaging,2013,37(6) :1024-1032.
  • 9侯小玲,汪奇,周迎,等.智能最佳管电压在双源CTFlash螺旋扫描冠状动脉成像中的应用[J].中国临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,7(2):525-528.
  • 10Puippe GD,Winklehner A, Hasenclever P, et al. Thoraco-abdom- inal high-pitch dual-source CT angiography:experimental evalua tion of injection protocols with an alaatomical human vascular phantom[J]. Eur J Radiol,2012,81(10) :2592-2596.

二级参考文献57

  • 1Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, et al. Raw data-based itera- tive Reconstruction in body CTA: Evaluation of radiation close saving potential. Eur Radiol, 2011,21(12) :2521-2526.
  • 2Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American college of radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol, 2007,4(5) :272-284.
  • 3Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative Reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: Feasibility study. AIR Am J Roentgehol, 2009,193(3) :764-771.
  • 4Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, et al. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detec- tor row CT examinations: Clinical evaluation. Radiology, 2005, 237(1) : 213-223.
  • 5Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye H J, et al. Radiation dose modulation tech- niques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radi- ographics, 2008,28(5) :1451-1459.
  • 6Barrtt HH, Swindell W. Radiological imaging: The theory of image formation, detection,and processing. [-s.l.J :Academic Press, 1996.
  • 7Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary CT angi- ography : Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for ra- diation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol, 2011,21(10) :2130-2138.
  • 8John MB, Estella MG. Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a ra- tional approach [J]. Raiology, 2003, 228: 353-360.
  • 9De Maertelaer TD, Gevenois PA. VDose reduction in mul- tidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation [J]. AJR, 2003, 181: 331-334.
  • 10Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, et al. Use of an auto- matic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multidetector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation [J]. Radiology, 2005, 237: 213-223.

共引文献87

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部