期刊文献+

非对称公平关切系数下虚拟企业激励机制研究 被引量:3

Incentive mechanism in virtual enterprise with asymmetry fairness concern factor
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对由公平中性盟主和公平关切盟员构成的虚拟企业,研究在考虑道德风险和盟员公平关切系数非对称情况下盟主对盟员的激励机制设计问题.结合委托代理理论,为盟主制定契约来激励盟员努力工作并甄别其公平关切程度.进而分析契约并与公平关切系数对称的情形对比.结果表明,当盟主不了解盟员的公平关切系数时,盟主期望利润下降,而拥有私有信息的盟员的努力程度降低且收益增加.这一结果体现了信息的价值,对虚拟企业的运营实践具有重要指导意义. For the virtual enterprise (VE) with a fairness neutral owner and a fairness concern partner, this paper investigates the incentive mechanism between the owner and the partner under moral hazard and asymmetric fairness concern factor. Incorporating principal-agent theory, the contract that the owner uses to motivate the partner and screen its true fairness concern factor is designed. Furthermore, the corresponding optimal contract is analyzed and compared with the symmetric scenario. The comparison results show that when the owner is uncertain about the partner's fairness concern factor, its expected profit decreases while the partner with private information exerts less effort but obtains higher income, which implies the value of information and is valuable to the operation of VE.
作者 陈克贵 黄敏
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期315-323,共9页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(71325002 61225012) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071028 70931001 710210 61) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20120042130003 20110042110024) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N110204003 N120104001) 流程工业综合自动化国家重点实验室基础科研业务费资助项目(2013ZCX11)
关键词 虚拟企业 激励机制 公平关切 信息非对称 委托代理 virtual enterprise incentive mechanism fairness concern asymmetric information principal-agent
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Walton J, Whicker L. Virtual enterprise: Myth and reality[J]. Journal of Control, 1996, 27(3): 22-25.
  • 2孙宪丽,黄敏,王兴伟.具有委托代理特征的虚拟企业分布式风险管理[J].系统工程学报,2010,25(5):659-665. 被引量:6
  • 3Jian CHEN Jianfeng CHEN.STUDY ON REVENUE SHARING CONTRACT IN VIRTUAL ENTERPRISES[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2006,15(1):95-113. 被引量:9
  • 4Fehr E, Schmidt K M. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114(3): 817-868.
  • 5Ho T H, Zhang J. Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter[J]. Man- agement Science, 2008, 54(4): 686-700.
  • 6Ho T H, Su X M. Theory of peer-induced fairness in games[J]. The American Economic Review, 2009, 99(5): 2022-2049.
  • 7Kahneman D, Knetsch J L, Thaler R. Fairness, competition on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market[J]. American Economics Review, 1986, 76(4): 728-741.
  • 8Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economic[J]. American Economics Review, 1993, 83(5): 1281-1302.
  • 9Dufwenberg M, Georg K. A theory of sequential reciprocity[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2004, 47(2): 268-298.
  • 10Cui T H, Raju J S, Zhang Z J. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8): 1303-1314.

二级参考文献106

共引文献443

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部