摘要
在分析开放科学数据仓储建设现状的基础上,分别选取国内外不同领域的开放科学数据仓储SRDA、eCrystals和Dryad,比较并总结这些仓储在注册与引用、共享与重用和保存等方面的异同。结果表明,自然科学和社会科学开放数据仓储建设模式存在差异,但具有普适的数据开发方式。
This paper is based on the analysis of the open scientific data repositories collection status. Three repositories, which are SRDA, eCrystals and Dryad, are chosen to compare their similarities and differences in registry and citation, share and reuse, as well as preservation. The results show that there are differences between the development models of science and social science open scientific data repositories, but some methods are suit for both.
出处
《图书馆学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第11期58-62,92,共6页
Research on Library Science
基金
国家万人计划青年拔尖人才项目"大数据环境下用户学术信息行为研究"的研究成果之一
