摘要
目的对比观察原位再生医疗技术(MEBT/MEBO)和磺胺嘧啶银锌霜治疗Ⅲ期褥疮的临床效果。方法将46例Ⅲ期褥疮患者利用随机数字表法随机分为治疗组(25例)与对照组(21例),治疗组采用原位再生医疗技术治疗,对照组采用磺胺嘧啶银锌霜治疗,观察、对比两组患者的60 d治愈率、最终白愈率、创面愈合时间、平均住院费用等。结果治疗组患者的60 d治愈率为64.00%,最终自愈率为84.00%,无效率为8.00%,平均愈合时间为57.06 d±10.18 d,平均住院费用为2.81万元±0.35万元。对照组患者的60 d治愈率为38.10%,最终自愈率为66.70%,无效率为14.20%,平均愈合时间为74.62 d±11.23 d,平均住院费用为3.75万元±0.46万元。结论原位再生医疗技术更有利于Ⅲ期褥疮创面愈合,可缩短住院时间,降低治疗费用,是治疗褥疮的有效方法,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To observe comparatively the clinical results of treating stage Ⅲ bedsores with MEBT/MEBO and sulfadiazine zinc silver cream respectively. Method A total of 46 patients with stageⅢbedsores were divided into treatment group （ 25 ） and control group （ 21 ） based on random number table. The treatment group adopted MEBT/MEBO treatment while the control group received the sulfadiazine zinc silver cream. The healing rate in 60 days, ultimate self-healing rate, wound healing time and average hospitalization expenses for both broups were observed and compared. Re-sult For treatment group, the healing rate in 60 days was 64.00%, the ultimate self-healing rate was 84.00%, the inef-fective ratewas 8.00%, the average healing time was 57.06 d ± 10.18 d and the average hospitalization expense was 28, 100 ± 3, 500 yuan. And, the same figures for control group were respectively 38.10%, 66.70%, 14.20%, 74.62 d ± 11.23 d and 37,500 ±4,600 yuan. Conclusion In-situ regenerative medical technology （MEBT/MEBO） is more condu-cive to wound healing of stage Ⅲ bedsores, shortening the hospitalization time and reducing the treatment cost. It is an ef-fective means to treat bedsores, being worthy of clinical promotion and application.
出处
《中国烧伤创疡杂志》
2014年第3期206-208,共3页
The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
关键词
原位再生医疗技术
磺胺嘧啶银锌霜
褥疮
创面
愈合
对照研究
In-situ Regenerative Medical Technology （ MEBT/MEBO）
Sulfadiazine Zinc Silver Cream
Bed-sore
Wounds
Healing
Control Study
