摘要
目的比较开环式微创痔吻合术(TST)与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)对脱垂性痔病术后肛管口径变化的影响。方法 60例脱垂性痔病患者随机均分为治疗组(采用TST术式)和对照组(采用PPH术式),比较两组手术疗效、术后肛管口径的变化及肛门坠胀。结果两组手术疗效相仿(P>0.05);与对照组比较,治疗组术后肛管口径改变小,肛门坠胀轻(P<0.05)。结论 TST治疗脱垂性痔病在术后肛管口径的变化及肛门坠胀方面优于PPH。
Objective To compare the effects of tissue-selecting therapy stapler （TST） with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids（PPH） on postoperative change of anal caliber in patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids. Methods Sixty patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids were equally randomized into two groups of A（accepted TST operation） and B（accepted PPH operation）. The efficacy of treatment,postoperative change of anal caliber and anal bulge were compared between two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the efficacy of treatment between two groups （P〉0. 05）. Compared with group B, the postoperative change of anal caliber was less and anal bulge was slighter in group A（P〈0. 05）. Conclusion As a treatment method for prolapsed hemorrhoids, TST is superior to PPH in postoperative change of anal caliber and anal bulge.
出处
《江苏医药》
CAS
北大核心
2014年第10期1170-1172,共3页
Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词
脱垂性痔病
开环式微创痔吻合术
痔上黏膜环切术
Prolapsed hemorrhoids
Tissue-selecting therapy stapler
Procedure {or prolapseand hemorrhoids
