摘要
法藏的判教思想可以分为三期:早期、中期、晚期。法藏早期采用五教十宗之判,中期则五教判教与四宗判教并用,晚期隐五说四,单说四宗判教。法藏一贯以理、事关系作为判教的依据,到中、后期判教文献中,逐渐转变为以佛性论为主要标准。在五教判教体系中,《大乘起信论》由所说绝言、依言二种真如先是被判为始、终、顿三教,后来则以佛性论为根据被判为终、顿二教。在四宗判教体系中,法藏主要依据佛性论判《大乘起信论》为"唯一无三"之"一乘究竟"。诸种教法之地位在四宗判教体系中比在五教判教体系中都有所提高,这体现了法藏欲以华严一乘圆教统摄诸教的努力。法藏把五教判教与四宗判教并列看待,以其圆融思想统摄各种判教,成为一无碍的体系。
The development of Fazang＇s thoughts of teaching classification may be divided into three periods： the early, the middle and the late. He used a ＂five teachings＂ classification system in the early period, both the ＂five teachings＂ and a ＂four teachings＂ one in the middle period, while avoided the ＂five teachings＂ in the late period. Fazang consistently made the relationship between the principle and phenomena as a standard of classification, which was gradually taken place by the Buddha - nature as a new standard in the middle and late periods. In the ＂ five teachings＂ system of classification, based on the distinction between ＂ the true thusness beyond language＂ and ＂the true thusness in language＂, Awakening of Faith of Mahayana was classified as three types of teachings at the same time： the Hinayana, the elementary teaching of Mahayana; the final teaching of Mahayana; the sudden enlightenment teaching. However, according to its teaching of the Buddha nature, it was lately classified into two of those three types mentioned. In the four teachings system of classification, it was classified as the final single vehicle without three vehicles. The four teachings system raised the status of the teachings, which reflected Fazang＇s efforts to include them into his Huayen teaching of perfect interfusion of single vehicle. He treated these two systems equally and fused various teachings into one harmonious system.
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期122-128,共7页
Social Sciences of Beijing
关键词
法藏
五教判教
四宗判教
文献学研究
哲学研究
Fazang
five teachings classification
four teachings classification
philological research
Philosophical research
