不同温度对比剂与CT血管造影不良反应间的关系研究被引量：5

Study of the adverse drug reactions of iodinated contrast agent in different temperatures after CT angiography

导出

摘要目的探讨注射不同温度的碘对比剂进行CT血管造影时受检者不良反应（ADR）的发生。方法将3200例进行多层螺旋CT血管造影的受检者随机分为常温组（n=1520）和加温组（n=1680），常温组与加温组分别在室温下（18℃-22℃）与将对比剂放入恒温箱加热至37℃后进行血管造影，观察两组受检者的外渗和过敏样反应的发生率。结果静脉注射碘普罗胺（优维显370）进行血管造影时，加温组的外渗和过敏样反应的发生率明显低于常温组。结论加热碘对比剂能明显降低不良反应的发生，值得大力推广应用。 Objective To investigate the relationship between iodinated contrast agent in different temperatures with incidence of adverse drug reactions （ADR） after CT angiography. Methods 3200 testers who examined with multi detector CT angiography were randomly divided into two groups, normal temperature group（n=1520） and heating group（n=1680）, which performed CT angiography with contrast agent of home temperature and heated to 37 in the constant temperature box. The incidence of exosmose and anaphylactoid reaction after contrast agent injection were detected. Results The incidence of exosmose and anaphylactoid reaction in heating group was lower than that of normal temperature group after iopromide intravenous injection. Conclusion It is worthy of being widely popularized in clinical application with heating of iodinated contrast agent which may reduce the incidence of ADR.

作者胡辉军陈娇霞邓虹张翔沈君

机构地区中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院放射科中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院内科门诊

出处《岭南现代临床外科》 2014年第3期308-310,共3页 Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery

基金广东省医学科研基金(编号:B2013122)

关键词 CT血管造影不良反应外渗过敏样反应 CT angiography Adverse drug reactions Exosmose Anaphylactoid reaction

分类号 R604 [医药卫生—外科学] R445.3 [医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1李佳欣,任喜君,李学奇.碘对比剂黏度对微循环的影响[J].中华放射学杂志,2012,46(7):669-670. 被引量：37
2慕朝伟,高润霖,陈纪林,杨跃进,乔树宾,姚民,秦学文,徐波,刘海波,吴永建,袁晋青,陈珏,李建军,戴军,尤士杰,窦克非,邱洪,王增武.非离子型碘造影剂的过敏样反应[J].中国循环杂志,2007,22(3):172-175. 被引量：45
3Sum W, Ridley LJ. Recognition and management of contrast media extravasation [J]. Australas Radiol, 2006, 50 (6) : 549-552.
4Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodineconcentration on vascular attenuation[J]. Radiology, 2005, 236(2): 661-665.
5周鹏,王秋林,蔡国才,李璐,蒋利成,杨震,黄秀萍.不同温度对比剂在冠状动脉造影术中不良反应的对比观察[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,20(10):769-771. 被引量：17
6Fischer HW. Viscosity, solubility and toxicity in the choice of angiographie contrast medium [ J ]. Angiology, 1965, 16 ( 12 ) : 759-766.
7Persson PB, Hansell P, Liss P. Pathophysiology of contrast medium-induced nephropathy [ J]. Kidney Int, 2005, 68 ( 1 ) : 14-22.
8Hazirolan T, Turkbey B, Akpinar E, et al. The impact of warmed intravenous contrast material on the holus geometry of coronary CT angiography applications [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2009, 10(2): 150-155.
9李兆祥.非离子型对比剂不良反应的表现、发生机理及预防处理.中国实用医药,2007,2(27):105-107.

二级参考文献20

1张龙江,祁吉.对比剂肾病:一个值得关注的问题[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(8):882-884. 被引量：70
2周玉杰,霍勇,卢才义,等.心脏病介入治疗疑难问题-造影剂[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2006:43.
3Rubin GD,Rofsky NM.CT and MR angiography:comprehensive vascular assessment[M].Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,2008.
4Roth R,Akin M,Deligonul U,et al.Influence of radiographic contrast media viscosity to flow through coronary angiographic catheters[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1991,22:290-294.
5夏良王玉锦.造影剂加温与副反应关系的调查分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2001,23(2):220-220.
6Lawrence V,Matthai W,Hartmaier S.Comparative safety of high-osmolality and low-osmolality radiographic contrast agents:Report of a multidisciplinary working group.Invest Radiol,1992,27:2-28.
7Barrett BJ,Parfrey PS,McDonald JR,et al.Nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast material for intravenous use in patients perceived to be at high risk:Randomized trial.Radiology,1992,183:105-110.
8Lieberman PL,Seigle RL.Reactions to radiocontrast material:Anaphylactoid events in radiology.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol,1999,17:469-496.
9Kumar S,Mahalingam R.Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast agents.Ped Rev,2001,22:356.
10Hagan JB.Anaphylactoid and adverse reactions to radiocontrast agents.Immunol Allergy Clin North Am,2004,24:507-519.