期刊文献+

中文版糖尿病自我管理及障碍问卷的修订和信效度分析 被引量:21

The reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的修订糖尿病自我管理及障碍问卷(PersonalDiabetesQuestionnaire,PDQ)并测量其信效度。方法翻译、修订形成中文版PDQ,采用专家咨询法和问卷调查法评定问卷的测量学指标。结果7个条目被重新修订。中文版PDQ具有良好的表面效度和内容效度,内容效度指数为0.96;以糖化血红蛋白值为效标,其效标关联效度分别为0.733(P〈0.001);中文版PDQ各分问卷在使用胰岛素和未使用的患者中的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.605-0.748、0.675-0.887;重测信度为0.876。结论中文版PDQ具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评估我国糖尿病患者的自我管理水平和障碍因素,以此指导健康教育项目的实施。 Objective To translate and revise the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire(PDQ),and to test its psycho- metric properties among diabetic patients. Methods The PDQ was revised and translated into Chinese version(C- PDQ) and its psychometric properties were tested. Results Among all the items,7 items were revised. The content validity index(CVI) of C-PDQ was 0.96 and the correlation coefficient between the score of C-PDQ and HbAlc was 0.733,which showed a satisfactory content validity and criterion validity,respectively. The Croubach's α coeffi- cients of the subscale of PDQ were 0.605-0.748 and 0.675-0.887 among patients with insulin treatment and with- out insulin treatment,respectively. The test-retest reliability was 0.876. Conclusion The C-PDQ is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of self-management and barriers of diabetic patients ,and can guide the design of dia- betic education program.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期734-738,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 糖尿病 2型 自我护理 信度 效度 Diabetes,Type 2 Self Care Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1World Health Organization.2008-2013 Action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommuni- cable diseases [R ].2008.
  • 2Carey MP,Jorgensen RS,Weinstock RS,et al. Reliability and validity of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale[J]. J Behav Med, 1991,14( 1 ) :43-51.
  • 3Stetson B,Schlundt D,Rothschild C,et al. Development and validation of The Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (PDQ):a measure of diabetes self-care behaviors,perceptions and barri-ers[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2011,91(3) :321-332.
  • 4Eigenmann CA,Colagiuri R,Skinner TC,et al.Are current psy- chometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes e- ducation?[J] Diabet Med,2009,26(4):425-436.
  • 5American Association of Diabetes Educators. AADE7 self-care behaviors[J]. The Diabetes Educator,2008,3(34):445-449.
  • 6American Association of Diabetes Educators. AADE Guidelines for the Practice of Diabetes Self- Management Education and Training (DSME/T)[J]. The Diabetes Educator,2009,Sl(35): 85s-107s.
  • 7Glasgow RE,Peeples M,Skov|und SE. Where is the patient in diabetes performance measures? The case for including patient- centered and self-management measures[J]. Diabetes Care, 2008,31 (5) : 1046-1050.
  • 8Colagiuri R,Eigenmann CA. A national consensus on outcomes and indicators for diabetes patient education[J]. Diabet Med, 2009,26 ( 4 ) : 442 -446.
  • 9尤黎明,吴瑛.内科护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:149-162.
  • 10中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:15-16.

共引文献240

同被引文献212

引证文献21

二级引证文献259

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部