期刊文献+

试论一类程序违法行政案件的判决——兼析《行政诉讼法》新司法解释第57、58、59条 被引量:1

On the Judgment of a Type of Administrative Cases Concerning Procedure Breaching ——Concurrent Analysis on the New Judicial Interpretation Art. 57, 58, 59 of Ad ministrative Procedural Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 对于程序违法但不可撤销或者重作的具体行政行为应如何处理 ,一直是司法机关难以解决的一个实际问题。结合新颁布的《最高人民法院关于执行〈中华人民共和国行政诉讼法〉若干问题的解释》,针对该种违法具体行政行为的 ,可采用几种判决方式 :(1 )判决被诉行政机关采取相应的补救措施 ;(2 )如果已给公民、法人或其他组织造成了损害 ,判决行政机关依法作出行政赔偿 ;(3 )判决被诉行政机关向行政相对方公开赔礼道歉 ;(4 )向被告和有关行政机关提出给予主要行政责任人员行政处分的司法建议 ;(5 )发现违法犯罪行为的 ,建议有权机关依法处理。 How to deal with the specific administrative acts which have breached the procedural law but cannot be revoked or redone has always been a practical problem that judicial organs have difficulties to solve. In light of the newly enacted interpretation made by the Supreme People's Court——Interpretation on a Number of Issues on Implementing the Administrative Procedural Law of People's Republic of China, and to counter such kind of illegal specific administrative acts, several ways of judgment which can be adopted are as follows: (1) the charged administrative organ will take remedial measures; (2) the charged administrative organ will make administrative remedy if citizens, legal persons or other organizations have been injured; (3) the charged administrative organ will make a public apologize to the counterpart; (4) judicial advice will be rendered to the defendant and the relevant administrative organs to make administrative sanctions to the major liable people; (5) when criminal acts are found, the authorized organization concerned should be advised to deal with things according to the legal provisions.
作者 杨亮庆
机构地区 南京师范大学
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第1期113-116,共4页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 程序违法 具体行政行为 行政诉讼 判决方式 Breach of Procedural Law Specific Administrative Act Revoke Redo
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1杨亮庆.民告官为何撤诉率高、领导的条子居功至伟[N].中国青年报,1999-11-29.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部