期刊文献+

厄洛替尼维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的系统评价 被引量:17

Erlotinib in the maintenance therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer:a systematic review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价厄洛替尼维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的有效性及安全性。方法:计算机检索The Cochrane Library、Web of science、EMbase、PubMed、CBM、CNKI和万方数据,收集厄洛替尼维持治疗NSCLC的临床随机对照试验,2名评价员按照纳入与排除标准筛选文献,提取资料,评价文献质量,采用RevMan5.1进行荟萃分析。结果:最终纳入4个临床随机对照试验,共3 046例患者。厄洛替尼维持治疗可延长晚期NSCLC患者的无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),HR=0.70,95%CI为0.63~0.77,P〈0.001。亚组分析结果显示,在任何性别(男或女)、病理类型(鳞癌或腺癌)、吸烟状况(吸烟与不吸烟)及免疫组化EGFR表达阳性的患者可获益,HR=0.73,95%CI为0.63~0.85,P〈0.001。厄洛替尼维持治疗可延长患者的总生存期(overall survival,OS),HR=0.90,95%CI为0.82~0.98,P=0.01;亚组分析结果显示,在女性(HR=0.75,95%CI为0.61~0.92,P=0.006)、腺癌(HR=0.84,95%CI为0.73~0.96,P=0.01)和不吸烟(HR=0.65,95%CI为0.49~0.86,P=0.002)的患者可获益。安全性方面,厄洛替尼维持治疗最主要的不良反应为皮疹(RR=22.51,95%CI为7.31~71.01,P〈0.001)和腹泻(RR=3.18,95%CI为1.65~6.14,P〈0.001);在贫血、中性粒细胞减少和间质性肺炎方面,2组差异均无统计学意义。结论:厄洛替尼维持治疗能延长晚期NSCLC患者的PFS和OS,且女性、腺癌、不吸烟和免疫组化EGFR表达阳性的患者是选择的优势人群。最主要的不良反应为皮疹和腹泻,毒副作用低可耐受。 OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).METHODS:We searched The Cochrane Library,web of science,EMbase,PubMed,CBM,CNKI and Wanfang data.Data analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.1software.RESULTS:The final analysis included four trials,covering 3 046patients.The results Meta-analyses showed the erlotinib significantly increased progression-free survival(PFS,HR=0.70,95%CI:0.63-0.77,P〈0.001)and overall survival(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.82-0.98,P=0.01)compared with placebo or observation.The PFS benefit was consistent in all subgroups including sex,smoking status,pathological types,EGFR immunohistochemistry-positive(HR=0.73,95%CI: 0.63-0.85,P〈0.001).Overall survival benefit was observed in patients with clinical features such as female(HR= 0.75,95%CI:0.61-0.92,P=0.006),adenocarcinoma(HR=0.84,95%CI:0.73-0.96,P=0.01),non-smoker(HR= 0.65,95%CI:0.49-0.86,P=0.002.The main adverse reactions were rashes(RR=22.51,95%CI:7.31-71.01,P 0.001)and diarrhea(RR=3.18,95%CI:1.65-6.14,P〈0.001).In anemia,and neutropenia,interstitial pneumonia,the difference between the two groups had no statistical significance.CONCLUSIONS:The results show that maintenance therapy with erlotinib produces a significant PFS and OS benefit for unselected patients with advanced NSCLC compared with placebo or observation,and may be better for female,non-smoker,and EGFR immunohistochemistry-positive and adenocarcinoma.The main adverse reactions were diarrhea and rashes,low toxicity can be tolerated.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第10期786-791,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 肺癌 非小细胞肺癌 厄洛替尼 维持治疗 随机对照试验 系统评价 lung cancer non-small cell lung cancer erlotinib maintenance therapy randomized controlled clinical study systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Stineheombe TE,Soeinki MA. Treatment paradigms for advanced stage non small cell lung cancer in the era of multiple lines of therapy[J]. J Thoracic Oncol, 2009,4 (2) : 243-250.
  • 2程婷婷,杨谨.晚期非小细胞肺癌维持治疗的研究进展[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2011,18(20):1651-1655. 被引量:27
  • 3Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. Erlotinib as mainte- nance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: amulti- centre,randomised, placebo controlled phase 3 study[J]. Lanct OncoL,2010,11 (6) :521 -529.
  • 4Perol M, Chouaid C, Milleron BJ, et al. Maintenance with either gem- citabine or erlotinib versus observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in ad- vanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase III study[J]. J Clin Oncol (meeting abstracts), 2010,28(20) : 7507-7512.
  • 5Parmar MK,Torri V, Stewart L, et al. Extracting summary sta- tistics to perform meta-analysis of the published literature for survival endpoints[J]. Stat Med, 1998,17 (24) : 2815-2834.
  • 6Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the. difference be tween two estimates[J]. BMJ,2003,326(7382) :219-224.
  • 7毋永娟,崔荣,华云旗,杨燕霞,刘丽萍,谭亚琴,张文慧,袁海清,刘伟东.培美曲塞与厄洛替尼维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究[J].中国全科医学,2011,14(9):966-968. 被引量:18
  • 8Mok TS, Wu YL, Yu CJ, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of sequential erlotinib and chemotherapy as first- line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(30) :5080 5087.
  • 9Kabbinavar FF, Miller VA, Johnson BE, et al. Overall survival (OS) in ATLAS, a phase m b trial comparing bevacizumab (B) therapy with or without erlotinib (E) after completion of chemotherapy (chemo) with B for first-line treatment of locally advanced, recur- rent,or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NS(2LC)[J]. J Clin Oncol (meeting abstracts) ,2010,28(4) :7526 -7530.
  • 10Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, et al. TRIBUTE Investigator Group:TRIBUTE:a phase lli trial of erlotinib hydrochloride(OSI- 774) combined with earboplatin and paelitaxel chemo~therapy in ad- vanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. J Clin Oneol, 2005,23 (25) : 5892-5899.

二级参考文献42

  • 1Helleday T. Homologous recombination in cancer development, treatment and development of drug resistance. Carcinogenesis, 2010, 316 (6): 955-960.
  • 2Goldie JH, Coldman AJ. A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat. Rep. 1979, 63(11-12): 1727-1733.
  • 3Alimta Package Insert. Available at: http://pi.lilly.com/us/alimta-pi.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2008.
  • 4Belani CP, Brodowicz T, Ciuleanu T, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed (Pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (Plac) plus BSC: A randomized phase Ⅲ study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27: CRA8000.
  • 5Ciuleanu T, Brodowicz T, Zielinski C, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small- cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet, 2009, 374(9699): 1432-1440.
  • 6Brodowicz T, Krzakowski M, Zwitter M, et al. Cisphtin and geracitabine firstline chemotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine or best supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase Ⅲ trial. Lung Cancer, 2006, 52(2): 155-163.
  • 7Belani CP, Barstis J, Perry MC, et al. Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or B,' non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(15): 2933-2939.
  • 8Belani CP, Ramalingam S, Perry MC, et al. Randomized, phase Ⅲ study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus standard every-3- weeks administration of carboplatin and pachtaxel for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(3): 468-473.
  • 9Center B, Petty WJ, Ayala D, et al. A phase Ⅰ study of gefitinib with concurrent dose-escalated weekly docetaxel and conformal three-dimensional thoracic radiation followed by consolidative docetaxel and maintenance gefitinib for patients with stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2010, 5(1): 69-74.
  • 10Fidias PM, Dakhil SR, Lyss AP, et al. Phase Ⅲ study of immediate compared with delayed docetaxel after front-line therapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(4): 591-598.

共引文献50

同被引文献167

  • 1何志惠,洪涛,苏群豪,曾江正,桑圣刚.自体DC/CIK联合厄洛替尼维持治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效分析[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(6):645-648. 被引量:6
  • 2余奇,郭澄.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂厄洛替尼的研究进展[J].药学服务与研究,2010,10(6):453-457. 被引量:5
  • 3梁颖,徐光川,陈丽昆,林勇斌,刘俊玲.INP和NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机研究[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2004,25(B07):225-228. 被引量:3
  • 4Lee KH. Lee KY, Jeon YJ . et al. Gefitinib in selected patientswith pre-treated non-small-cell lung cancer;results from a phaseIV, multicenter, non-randomized study ( SELINE) [J]. TubercRespir Dis (Seoul) , 2012 ,73(6) : 303-311.
  • 5Mok TS*Wu YL,Thongprasert S,et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma [J]. N Engl J Med,2009,361(10):947-957.
  • 6Zhou C,Wu YL,Chen G,et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy asfirst-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer ( optimal, ctong-0802) : a mul-ticentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study [J]. Lancet On-col, 2011,12(8) : 735-742.
  • 7Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S,et al. Biomarker analyses andfinal overall survival results from a phase HI,randomized,open-label,first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinicallyselected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia(IPASS) [J]. J Clin Oncol,2011,29(21) :2866-2874.
  • 8Rosell R,Moran T, Queralt C, et al. Screening for epidermal growthfactor receptor mutations in lung cander [J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,361(10):958-967.
  • 9Chin CH, Ho HL, Chiang CL,et al. Clinical characteristics andtreatment outcomes of lung adenocarcinomas with discrepantEGFR mutation testing results derived from PCR-direct sequen-cing and Real-Time PCR-based Assays [J]. J Thorac Oncol,2014,9(1):91-96.
  • 10Huang Z,Wang Z,Bai H,et al. The detection of EGFR mutation sta-tus in plasma is reproducible and can predict the efficacy of EGFR-TKI dynamically[J]. Thoracic Cancer,2012,3(4) :334-340.

引证文献17

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部