期刊文献+

低频超声联合抗生素对表皮葡萄球菌生物膜渗透性的影响 被引量:3

Effect of low-frequency ultrasound in combination with antibiotics on penetration of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的研究低频超声联合不同抗生素对表皮葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus epidermidis)RP62A生物被膜(biofi lm,BF)渗透性的影响。方法体外建立成熟RP62A BF模型,用扫描电镜(scanning electron microscope,SEM)确认并观察BF的形态结构;平板计数法计算活菌总量;建立生物膜抗生素渗透模型,低频超声联合干预治疗1h、3h,测量抑菌环直径大小。结果低频超声显著增强了庆大霉素和头孢噻肟对表皮葡萄球菌生物膜的渗透性,头孢噻肟联合超声组(1h、3h)和庆大霉素联合超声组(3h)与CB对照组相比均有显著差异(P<0.05);当超声延长至3h后,万古霉素的渗透性略有增强。结论低频超声可不同程度增强抗生素对表皮葡萄球菌生物膜的渗透性。 Objective To study the effect of low-frequency ultrasound combined with antibiotics on penetration of S. epidermidis RP62A strain biofilm (BF). Methods Mature biofilm model of S. epidermidis RP62A strain was established, the BF structures were confirmed and observed by scanning electron microscope(SEM); viable counts were determined by drop plating after suspending the biofilm cells; the penetration of antibiotics through the biofilms was established, after lh and 3h with ultrasonication interventions, the diameter of zones of growth inhibition were measured. Results Low-frequency ultrasonic significantly increased the transport of gentamicin and cefotaxime through the biofilm, cefotaxime combined with low-frequency ultrasound(1h and 3h) and gentamicin combined with low-frequency ultrasound(3h) showed significant difference in comparison with the CB control group (P〈0.05); vancomycin was also moderately increased with time of ultrasound to 3h. Conclusion Low-frequency ultrasonic can enhance the penetration of antibiotics through the S. epidermidis biofilm in varying degrees.
出处 《中国抗生素杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期390-393,共4页 Chinese Journal of Antibiotics
关键词 生物膜 低频超声 表皮葡萄球菌 渗透性 Biofilm Low-frequency ultrasound Staphylococcus epidermidis Penetration
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Kurtz S M, Lau E, Schmier J, et al. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States[J]. J Arthropl, 2008, 23(7): 984-991.
  • 2Arciola C R, Campoccia D, Speziale P, et al. Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials[J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(26): 5967-5982.
  • 3Mack D, Davies A P, Harris L G, et al. Microbial interactions in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms[J]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2007, 387(2): 399-408.
  • 4Khoury A E, Lam K, Ellis B, et al. Prevention and control of bacterial infections associated with medical devices[J]. ASAIOJ, 1992, 38(3): M174.
  • 5Pitt W G, McBride M O, Lunceford J K, et al. Ultrasonic enhancement of antibiotic action on gram-negative bacteria[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1994, 38(11): 2577-2582.
  • 6Bartley J, Young D. Ultrasound as a treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. MedHypotheses, 2009, 73(1): 15-17.
  • 7Anderl J N, Franklin M J, Stewart P S. Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin[J]. AntimicrobAgents Chemother, 2000, 44(7): 1818-1824.
  • 8Singh R, Ray P, Das A, et al. Penetration of antibiotics through Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2010, 65(9): 1955-1958.
  • 9Carmen J C, Nelson J L, Beckstead B L, et al. Ultrasonic- enhanced gentamicin transport through colony biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli[J]. J Infect Chemother. 2004. 10(4): 193-199.
  • 10Sousa C, Teixeira P, Oliveira R. The role of extracellular polymers on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm biomass and metabolic activity[J]. J Basic Microbiol, 2009, 49(4): 363-370.

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部