期刊文献+

基于多种DEA模型和Gini准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价 被引量:23

An Approach on the Performance Evaluation Problems Based on Multiple DEA Models and Gini Criterion ——Evaluating the Performance of Universities in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对多种数据包络分析(Data Envelopment Analysis,简称DEA)模型会产生不同绩效评价结果的问题,提出基于Gini准则科学地融合各DEA模型结果的方法。首先基于Gini准则定义信息纯度以衡量各DEA模型结果的确定性并赋予权重,然后通过加权融合最终得出客观唯一的综合效率。此外,根据评价者的偏好信息或先验知识,进一步提出交互式多DEA模型-Gini准则方法。以前学者仅从单一角度出发选择DEA模型评价高校的运营绩效,考虑到从不同角度出发的多种DEA模型可以给出高校更加全面客观的运营绩效评价,利用以上方法对2011年国内25所理工类高校的运营绩效进行了实证分析,结果验证了以上方法可以合理有效的衡量各高校的运营绩效表现,对于高校运营绩效的评价研究具有实际指导意义。 To deal with the problem that multiple DEA models might generate different performance evaluation results,an approach based on the Gini criterion is proposed by fusing the results together scientifically.Firstly,the purity of information based on the Gini criterion is defined to measure the certainty of the results,and then the weights are given to each DEA model.A unique set of comprehensive efficiencies can be obtained by weighting the results of each DEA model and the corresponding model weight.Moreover, considering the preference and priori information of estimators,interactive multiple DEA models and Gini criterion approach are further proposed.Measuring the performance of higher education colleges is one of important applications in DEA,and previous researches study the problem just choose the evaluation DEA model from a single point of view.It would be more comprehensive and objective if multiple DEA models that are from multiple points of view are used.Consequently,applying the proposed method to evaluate the performance of 25science and engineering universities in 2011,and the empirical results show that the approach is reasonable and effective,which has practical significance in the research of measuring the performance of higher education colleges.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期98-104,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70773052)
关键词 绩效评价 数据包络分析 Gini准则 综合效率 performance evaluation data envelopment analysis Gini criterion comprehensive efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the ef ficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 9(6) : 429--444.
  • 2Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envel opment analysis [J]. Management Science, 1984, 30 (9): 1078 -1092.
  • 3Charnes A, Cooper W W, Seiford L M, et al. A multi plieative model for efficiency analysis [J]. Socio-Eco- nomic Planning Sciences, 1982, 16(5): 223--224.
  • 4Andersen P, Petersen N C. A procedure for ranking ef- ficient units in DEA [J]. Management Science, 1993, 39(10): 126 -1264.
  • 5Du Juan, Liang Liang, Zhu J. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis; A corn ment [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 204(3):694--697.
  • 6王赫一,张屹山.两阶段DEA前沿面投影问题研究——兼对我国上市银行运营绩效进行评价[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(2):114-120. 被引量:20
  • 7马雁军.基于非参数回归技术的DEA两分步法优化与政府绩效评价[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(2):157-164. 被引量:7
  • 8陆志鹏,王洁方,刘思峰,方志耕.区间DEA模型求解算法及其在项目投资效率评价中的应用[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(4):165-169. 被引量:12
  • 9Cooper W W, Sieford L M, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applica- tions, references and DEA solver software (2nd ed. ) [M]. 2th ed. New York.. Springer, 2006.
  • 10Soleimani-damaneh M, Zarepisheh M. Shannon's en- tropy for combining the efficiency results of different DEA models: Method and application [J]. Expert Sys- tems with Applications, 2009, 36(3): 5146--5150.

二级参考文献81

共引文献218

同被引文献312

引证文献23

二级引证文献349

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部