期刊文献+

气候变化背景下国际投资规则的发展趋势及我国对策研究 被引量:6

Trends of International Investment Rules under the Context of Climate Change and Countermeasures of China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统国际投资条约与应对气候变化存在一些矛盾和冲突,因此应实现国际投资条约与气候变化应对条约之间的衔接,兼顾投资自由化与政府管制。要实现这一目标,最佳方式是通过改变国际投资条约以顺应应对气候变化的低碳运动,改变国际投资条约将促进和保护投资作为唯一重心的现状,并采纳环境保护等其他领域的国际法规则。近年来国际投资领域呈现可持续发展的投资政策趋势。目前一些投资保护协定范本和新签订的双边和区域性投资协定已经纳入并不断完善环境保护等有关东道国管制外资内容的条款,逐步实现投资者利益与东道国利益保护的平衡。我国对现有国际投资条约进行调整、修订以及新投资条约的谈判,应考虑国际投资条约的这一发展趋势,以顺应国际投资的可持续发展政策。 There are some contradictions and conflicts between traditional international investment treaties and addressing climate change, therefore convergence of international investment treaties and treaties addressing climate change should be achieved, giving consideration to both investment liberalization and government regulation. To a- chieve this goal, the best way is to modify international investment treaties to conform to low - carbon action address- ing climate change, to change the status that the international investment promotion and protection is the sole focus of investment treaties, and to adopt the rules of international environmental protection law. In recent years international investment policies reveal the trend of sustainable development. At present, some model international investment a- greements and more new bilateral and regional investment agreements have contained the terms of environmental pro- tection by the host countries, realizing progressively the balance between interest protection of investors and host countries. While modifying existing international investment treaties and carrying out negotiation of new investment treaties, China should consider this development trend of international investment treaties so as to conform to interna- tional investment policies for sustainable development.
作者 刘万啸
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 2014年第2期96-104,共9页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 中国博士后科学基金第四十九批面上资助项目:国际投资协定与气候变化--低碳时代的国际投资新规则(20110490504) 山东省2012年度高校人文社科研究计划项目:国际投资中的环境保护法律规制研究(J12WB08)的阶段性研究成果 山东省"十二五"重点学科经济法学建设项目资助成果
关键词 国际投资 投资条约 气候变化 低碳经济 international investment investment treaties climate change low-carbon economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1OECD (2004, September). Fair and Equitable Treatment Standards in International Law. Retrieved March 2010 from: http://www, oecd. org/ dataoecd/22/53/33776498, pdf.
  • 2余劲松,梁丹妮.公平公正待遇的最新发展动向及我国的对策[J].法学家,2007(6):151-156. 被引量:40
  • 3UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2010: Investing in a Low -Carbon Economy (R).
  • 4龚震.我国企业海外投资需要调整思路[EB/OL].http://www.mlr.gov.cn/xwdt/jrxw/201211/t20121102_1153143.htm,2013-06-17.
  • 5NAFTA Arbitration : SD Myers v. Canada, 2000, paras. 243 - 251.
  • 6KATE MILES. International Investment Law and Climate Change Issues in the Transition to a Low Carbon World [ EB/OL]. Published by the Society of International Economic Law. July 2,2008 available at : http ://ssm. corn/abstract = 1154588.
  • 7Fiona Marshall, Climate Change and International Investment Agreements: Obstacles or Opportunities? (R). Published by the International In- stitute for Sustainable Development. March 2010.
  • 8商务部,国家统计局,国家外汇管理局.2012年度中国对外直接投资统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2013/09-09/5261623.shtml.2014-02-06.
  • 9UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2012 : Towards a New Generation of Investment Policies (R).
  • 10赵玉敏.国际投资体系中的准入前国民待遇——从日韩投资国民待遇看国际投资规则的发展趋势[J].国际贸易,2012(3):46-51. 被引量:47

二级参考文献20

  • 1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:40
  • 2PSEG Global Inc. & etc. v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/5, p. 62, Award, January 19, 2007.
  • 3Azufix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, icsiD Case No. ARB/01/12, pp.129-135, Award, July 14, 2006.
  • 4LG&E Energy Corp. LG&E Capital Corp. LG&E International Inc. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, para. 122-126, Decision Liability, October 3, 2006
  • 5CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, para. 274-278, Award (May 12,2005 )
  • 6MTD Equity Sdn. and MTD Chile S.A.v. Republic of Chile, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, Award (May 25, 2004) .
  • 7Supplementary reasons for BCSC Decision (October 31 2001), para. 4. at http: //ita.law.uvic.ca/Metalclad-BCSC Additional Reasons htm.
  • 8Tecnicas Medioambientables Tecmed S.A.v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF) 100102, Award, para. 154, May 29, 2003.
  • 9LG&E Energy Corp. I.G&E Capital Corp. LG&E International Inc. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, para. 130, Decision Liability, October 3, 2006.
  • 10PSEG Global Inc. & etc. v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/5, para. 221, Award, January 19, 2007.

共引文献85

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部