期刊文献+

A feasibility study of using two-component polyurethane adhesive in constructing wooden structures 被引量:3

A feasibility study of using two-component polyurethane adhesive in constructing wooden structures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 This investigation was conducted to determine the feasibility of using a two-component polyurethane (PUR) adhesive, with special waterproof properties, in constructing wooden structures. We designed and conducted tests to compare the shear strength and adhesion performance of PUR with polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) adhesive on block-shear specimens constructed of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis L.), fir (Abies alba Mill.), poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr.), white oak (Quercus alba L.), sycamore (Platanus orientalis L.) and white walnut (Juglans cinerea L.). The values of the percentage of wood failure were also determined in specimens constructed with each adhesive. The highest shear strength values of both adhesives were obtained in specimens constructed of beech, while the lowest shear strength values were obtained in fir and poplar specimens. Average shear strength of the PUR adhesive was 16.5% higher than that of the PVAc adhesive. Specimens constructed of fir, poplar and sycamore were characterised by the highest percentages of wood failure, whereas the lowest average percentages of wood failure were obtained in beech and oak specimens. With the exception of oak specimens, there was no statistically significant difference between percentage of wood failure among the PUR and PVAc adhesives. Generally, the PUR adhesive showed an acceptable adhesion performance on wood materials used in our study. This investigation was conducted to determine the feasibility of using a two-component polyurethane (PUR) adhesive, with special waterproof properties, in constructing wooden structures. We designed and conducted tests to compare the shear strength and adhesion performance of PUR with polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) adhesive on block-shear specimens constructed of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis L.), fir (Abies alba Mill.), poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr.), white oak (Quercus alba L.), sycamore (Platanus orientalis L.) and white walnut (Juglans cinerea L.). The values of the percentage of wood failure were also determined in specimens constructed with each adhesive. The highest shear strength values of both adhesives were obtained in specimens constructed of beech, while the lowest shear strength values were obtained in fir and poplar specimens. Average shear strength of the PUR adhesive was 16.5% higher than that of the PVAc adhesive. Specimens constructed of fir, poplar and sycamore were characterised by the highest percentages of wood failure, whereas the lowest average percentages of wood failure were obtained in beech and oak specimens. With the exception of oak specimens, there was no statistically significant difference between percentage of wood failure among the PUR and PVAc adhesives. Generally, the PUR adhesive showed an acceptable adhesion performance on wood materials used in our study.
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第2期477-482,共6页 林业研究(英文版)
关键词 wooden structures polyurethane adhesive polyvinyl acetate adhesive shear strength wood failure wood species wooden structures, polyurethane adhesive, polyvinyl acetate adhesive, shear strength, wood failure, wood species
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Altinok M, Ta? HH, Sancak E. 2009. Load carrying capacity of spline joints as affected by board and adhesives type. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(5): 479–473.
  • 2ASTM D-4680. 1998. Standard test method for creep and time to failure of adhesives in static shear by compression loading (Wood-to-Wood). The American Society of Testing and Materials, USA.
  • 3ASTM D-5266. 1999. Standard practice for estimating the percent wood failure in adhesive joints. The American Society of Testing and Materials, USA.
  • 4ASTM D-905. 1998. Standard test method for strength properties of adhesive bonds in shear by compression loading. The American Society of Testing and Materials, USA.
  • 5Beaud F, Niemz P, Pizzi A. 2006. Structure-property relationships in one-component polyurethane adhesives for wood: sensitivity to low moisture content. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 101(6), 4181–4192.
  • 6Burdurlu E, Kili? Y, Elibol GC, Kili? M. 2006. The shear strength of Calabrian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) bonded with polyurethane and polyvinyl acetate adhesives. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 99(6): 3050–3061.
  • 7Custódio J, Broughton J, Cruz H. 2009. A review of factors influencing the durability of structural bonded timber joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 29(2): 173–185.
  • 8Derikvand M, Smardzewski J, Maleki S, Dalvand M, Ebrahimi G. 2013. Withdrawal force capacity of mortise and loose tenon T-type furniture joints. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37: 377–384.
  • 9Keskin H, Atar M, Akyildiz MH. 2009. Bonding strengths of poly (vinyl acetate), Desmodur-VTKA, phenol-formaldehyde, and urea-formaldehyde adhesives in wood materials impregnated with vacsol azure. Materials and Design, 30(9): 3789–3794.
  • 10Konnerth J, Gind W, Harm M, Müller U. 2006. Comparing dry bond strength of spruce and beech wood glued with different adhesives by means of scarf- and lap joint testing method. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 64(4): 269–271.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部