期刊文献+

超声双重造影评估直肠癌术前T分期的价值 被引量:16

Diagnostic value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨超声双重造影在评估直肠癌术前T分期中的价值.方法 对71例直肠癌患者术前经直肠腔内灌注胃肠超声造影剂和静脉注射微泡造影剂行超声造影(双重造影)检查,观察肿瘤边界、形态以及微循环灌注等情况,根据肿瘤与肠壁层次的关系进行T分期,分别将单纯灌注造影和双重造影分期与术后病理结果对照.结果 术前灌注超声造影T分期总准确率71.8%,其中T1、T2、T3、T4准确率分别为72.7%、50.0%、74.4%、76.9%;双重造影T分期总准确率85.9%,其中T1、T2、T3、T4准确率分别为90.9%、75.0%、87.1%、84.6%.超声双重造影T分期准确性高于灌注超声造影(P<0.05).结论 超声双重造影能清晰显示直肠癌的边界、形态和微循环灌注情况,对肿瘤术前T分期有较高的准确性. Objective To evaluate the preoperative T staging value of rectal carcinoma by using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS).Methods 71 patients with rectal carcinoma were examined by ultrasound after infusing contrast agent and bolus injection of SonoVue preoperatively.The border,shape and perfusion patterns of the tumor were observed.After surgery,the T staging made by DCUS and perfused contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (PCUS) was compared with final pathologic results respectively.Results The accuracy of PCUS and DCUS in determining the T stage of rectal carcinoma were 71.8%(T1 72.7%%,T250.0%,T374.4%,T476.9%) and 85.9%(T190.9%,T275.0%,T387.1%,T484.6%) respectively.The difference between these two methods was statistically significant (P 〈0.05).Conclusions DCUS is a new valuable method for T staging of rectal carcinoma with its high accuracy preoperatively.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期312-315,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 浙江省卫生厅医药卫生科技项目(2012KYB014)
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 直肠肿瘤 肿瘤分期 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Rectal neoplasms Neoplasm staging
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1Deng-Fu Yao, Xin-Hua Wu, Yong Zhu, Gong-Sheng Shi, Zhi-Zhen Dong, Deng-Bing Yao, Wei Wu, Li-Wei Qiu and Xian-Yong Meng Nantong, China Research Center of Clinical Molecular Biology , Department of Pathology and Department of Gastroenterology , Affiliated Hos- pital of Nantong University,Department of Diagnostics , and Institute of Neurosciences , Nantong University,Nantong 226001, China.Quantitative analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular density and their clinicopathologic features in human hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2005,4(2):220-226. 被引量:81
  • 2王肖琴,樊家玉,倪婉珍,郑媛媛.口服超声造影剂强回声型在胃壁肿块诊断中的价值[J].中国超声诊断杂志,2005,6(7):506-508. 被引量:18
  • 3Hong-Chuan Zhao,Rong Qin,Xiao-Xin Chen,Xia Sheng,Ji-Feng Wu,Dao-Bin Wang,Gui-Hua Chen.Microvessel density is a prognostic marker of human gastric cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(47):7598-7603. 被引量:25
  • 4郭心璋.胃窗-85超声显像剂在胃疾病超声诊断中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,1988,68:288-288.
  • 5Wakelin SJ, Deans C, Crofts TJ, et al. A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol,2002,41:161-167.
  • 6Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, et al. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer, 2000,88: 1781-1787.
  • 7Minami M, Kawauchi N, Itai Y, et al. Gastric tumors: radiologicpathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT. Radiology, 1992,185: 173-178.
  • 8Kadowaki K,Murakami T, Yoshioka H, et al. Helical CT imaging of gastric cancer., normal wall appearance and the potential for staging. Radiat Med, 2000,18 : 47-54.
  • 9Ganpat hi IS, So J B, Ho K Y. Endoscopic ult rasonography for gastric cancer. Does it influence treatment? Surg Endosc, 2006, 20: 559- 562.
  • 10Javaid G, Shah OJ, Dar MA, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma. ANZ J Surg,2004,74: 108-111.

共引文献276

同被引文献146

引证文献16

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部