期刊文献+

重新思考公民与公共生活 基于儒家立场和中国历史经验 被引量:25

Citizenship and Public Life Revisited:Based on the Confucian Views and Chinese Historical Experience
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于中国的历史经验和儒家理念,重新思考公共生活与公民概念。在西方,无论在历史中还是在理论中,公共生活的基本载体都是城邦,这是一个点状的政治共同体。不过,至少从尧舜开始,自觉的中国就呈现为超大规模的文明与政治共同体,由此也决定了中国的公共生活形态和公民身份与西方不同:中国存在着多中心、多层级的公共生活单元;所有人在不同层级上参与公共生活,多少都具有公民性;作为积极公民的古典君子或者儒家士君子的公民身份是多层次和可扩展的,是真正的国家公民。这一中国经验提醒我们,应该超越基于西方经验形成的关于公共生活和公民的地方性概念和理论,发展更为普遍的共同体、公共生活和公民理论。 Based on Chinese historic experience and Confucian ideas, this paper reflects upon the concepts of public life and citizen, which originate from Western experience. In both Western histories and theories, the basic carrier of public life was polis, or city, a small-scale political unit. China, however, has been a super-scale civilization and political body since Emperor Yao and Emperor Shun, about B.C. 2000. This has made the patterns of public life and citizenship in China different from its western counterparts. During Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, three characteristics featured public life and citizenship: multi-centric units of public life; every person having varying degrees of publicity; and Junzi, as the most active citizen, owning multi-layered identities and acting throughout hierarchical political systems. In the post- classical period, Confucian adherents were devoted to cultivate a non- hierarchical Shi-Junzi (scholar-Junzi) as the promoter, organizer and leader of public life, and build a series of effective institutions supporting public life. As a result, we can observe a picture of multi-layered and multi-centric public life and citizenship.. Every people lived in more than one public communities, and had more than one citizenship identity generally, participating in public life on different levels; In every community, Shi-Junzi or gentlemen worked as active citizens, differentiated themselves from Xiaoren, the inactive mass; Shi-Junzi was the only group connected with all communities. This paper concludes that the conceptualization of public life and citizenship was situated in a Western context, and calls for the development of a universal concept of the terms which can accommodate both the case of China and the West.
作者 姚中秋
出处 《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期145-162,共18页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
关键词 公民 公共生活 儒学 君子 citizenship, public life, Confucianism, Junzi
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1阿克曼,布鲁斯.2004.我们人民:宪法的根基[M].孙力、张朝霞,译.北京:法律出版社.
  • 2奥尔森 M.集体行动的逻辑[M].陈郁,译.上海人民出版社,1995.
  • 3梁启超.1989.新民说[M].北京:中华书局.
  • 4诺思,道格拉斯·C.1994.经济史上的结构和变革[M].陈郁,等,译.上海人民出版社.
  • 5严复.原强[G]//王械.严复集:第1册[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 6姚中秋.重新发现儒家[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2012.
  • 7姚中秋.2013a.国史纲要[M].海口:海南出版社.
  • 8姚中秋.2013b.治理秩序论:经义今诂[M].南宁:广西师范大学出版社.

共引文献15

同被引文献319

引证文献25

二级引证文献253

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部